Can someone explain this 3S-2S combo and why it is sooooo good? I thought this summer the rules were changed that there would be a deduction/penalty for a change of edge in between combos? I mean, she should be working on 3S-2Lutz if she wants to go CCW-CW. Did Sonja Hilmer get a deduction for her change of edge in between the two jumps? Or does that only just apply to Russian skaters such as Valieva? (Which was CLEARLY obvious why the ISU voted/ruled on such a change of edge injustice) Just trying to think through this new rule and how a 3S-2S wouldn't be penalized under the new rules.... Again, very short-sighted ISU as per usual.
ETA: I've watched clips of Valieva actively working on holding the edge this summer, and well, she adapted. Quelle surprise. And maybe/probably she's working on -3Loop combos too anyway, which she's been doing for years in practice. She's amazing.
First of all, I want to say the rule is hardly applied, it was put there to make people happy. You ever seen the prerotation rule applied? No, because they don't apply those rules.
Although, on the topic of this rule: the spirit of the rule was there so that people didn't use it to reload and make it easier to do a cascade, it wasn't intended for jumps like this. It wasn't an injustice vote at all, and Russians weren't the only people doing it. We all got taught this technique, and it is wrong, bad technique and not how a combination should work (as well as potentially causing damage to upper body). It'd labouring jumps instead of relying on technique and landing of first jump.
Combinations shouldn't be like this, it's a butchering new cheat technique to make them easier rather than preserve quality of combinations (and as I said, whilst some Russians notably Valieva do this, other russians e.g. Kolyada, Tuktamysheva etc dont). In fact, I donr even think Russians were neccessarily the first to do this, even if its a common Tutberidze trait nowadays.
When something is lower quality it deserves lower GOE - agree on this point? And a change of edge in between combos to reload makes them lower quality. This is how the rule came in place, to prevent individual judges being conflicted on how to punish GOe of a lower quality jump when no rule there is invoked about edge change.
Whilst I don't think this jump breaks the spirit of the rules, it'd be perfectly reasonable to follow them and award negative GOE for the edge change. In fact, it would probably encourage further rule discussions and clarifications. I'll be waiting to see what happens next with this.
Please note however, that even if the rule is applied, it doesn't automatically mean negative GOE. GOE on jumps is additive. You can get negative bullets that balance with positive ones. I believe this jump got negative goe anyways due to the landing.