It was maybe unclear, but that is not my meaning. I was just saying the difference between the two programs so I didn't need to spell it out, but here are my thoughts:
Current = 3Lz-3Lo, 2A-3T, 2A, 3Lz, 3F, 3F-2T-2Lo, 3S
Maximum = 3Lz-3Lo, 2A-3T, 2A, 3Lz, 3F, 3F-eu-3S, 2A
The current layout isn't in order so it's easy to see the differences. The maths is -(-2t-2lo) + (-eu-) + 2A = 0.8. However it looks like it isn't possible to do 3 2As, and I'm not saying Alina should do this either if she could have.
I just saw my post, and I did say that I wasn't talking about -eu-2A actually.
But I think this is why a quad is so so valuable. Anna Scherbakova in essence is replacing (2t-2lo) for a 4Lz. As long as she gets more than 3 points for it she's not losing out at all. I really hope Alina gets a quad!