I think it's arrogance in that he's saying "I know figure skating, so I'm allowed to make speculations with no evidence whatsoever that a skater's federation won him a gold instead of the skater actually achieving that." It's one thing to say Ten should have won (something I agree with), but it's another thing to accuse Skate Canada and question their integrity by suggesting they manipulated and politicked for their skater to win. It is also insulting to things that Chan actually did do well, such as his excellent SP, and the two quads landed in the LP which contributed to the victory. Even saying "Chan didn't win, the judging system did." would have been a more 'accurate' statement (though still an insulting one), but instead he chose to make a defamatory statement against Skate Canada.
A bit odd that nobody but you feel his comments very offensive here, and kept this topic again and again. Maybe because most of other people found the results of WC2013 are weird and questionable? But As I said, if you think he is arrogant, so be it. You do not need to explain yourself again and again.
My skepticism is of people saying "the reason he made mistakes in his SP is because of injury". He's been a very consistent jumper in the past, but his jumping ability is diminished from the past... so it makes sense for him to make errors. Note his mistakes in his programs at Russian nationals. Note that he didn't attempt the 4T internationally in his SP last season when he had no problem attempting it before. And he's had more recent problems with his 3Z than in the past. It would be like me saying "Chan must have been injured at Worlds because he's been able to land 3Z's in his sleep when he's healthy enough." to rationalize his poor performance. I agree that injuries may have contributed to a poorer performance, but I can't picture him wanting to compete while injured and further risking injury, against such a strong field that could push him off the podium and likely would have, and in a competition that isn't particularly important which he's won many times before.
Ya, right, like Plushenko attended several international competitions without quads! He attended competitions two times in the last season, one of them is RN where he performed quads in both his SP and LP. You are so right he did not attempt any quads internationally last season, since he only competed once and only performed a quadless SP. It is really a very great example of saying now Plushenko would not try quads internationally.
It doesn't seem like he's the type to go for the "old college try" though. He's not the type to just "show up" given his reputation... he comes to win. So he must have felt prepared enough to win. With the Olympics next year, where Plushenko presumably wants to beat Fernandez/Brezina/Joubert/Amodio, it's not smart to show up with an injury and an SP with no quad, and potentially have people say Fernandez/Brezina/Joubert/Amodio can beat me and are technically superior. Injury or not, he would have still been 3rd or 4th after the SP, and with Fernandez's FS, he would have likely lost. So it would have made more sense to rest up until he's back to better health enough to put a quad in his SP so he actually has a legitimate shot against the other guys instead of have reduced content and is simply perceived as trying to "keep up"... not to mention it goes against Plushenko's own words that your program should have a quad.
Should I thank you for having so much faith in him to show up and win? And to understand your skeptical thinking because he could not reach this goal?
I get that Plushenko's own words on quads will be used to haunt him by people like you. He should keep his word jumping quads until he could not stand anymore to please people like you. Too bad he still consider his health a little bit more to not performing quads when he felt he could not, and withdraw from the competition to take surgery in order to continue.
My issue isn't him pulling out of the FS to tend to his health (that fall and the lutz could have indeed exacerbated his injury to a point that he didn't think it was worth it, especially given the standings)... it's with his fans dismissing his poor performance as solely due to injury. It would kind of be like if Chan/Hanyu/Fernandez/Takahashi had said before 2013 Worlds that he's nursing an ankle injury, so then if he he skated well people could say "Oh wow, he did well even while injured!" or in case he skated poorly people could say "Oh, well, he has an injury, so that's why he skated poorly". In Nagano, Stojko didn't want people to know about his groin injury because he didn't want people to make excuses for him or to have lowered expectations.
You are insane, just insane. if other skaters would not announce their injury, it is their business. If they did, I bet you will use this to defend Chan's bad performance. Plushenko's injuries were known to a lot of people (except you), he had so many operations done on him. He is celebrity in some way, so people who care about him knows his status. People who does not care him, like you, will have your expectations. I do not see you lower your expectation so what is the matter?
And as for his bad performance, no fans really defended his EC2004 LP melt down performance, right? No one really cited injury for that performance, right? Plushenko himself never said anything to defend that performance, right? In my opinion, you just cannot bear other people have logical way of thinking things. You just mad that people like me will not let you repeat your "skeptical thinking" without fighting for your true purpose: making people believe that Plushenko is done in this sports: "He was only a great consistent jumper to win the games in the past, now he could not even jump so he is over, done!" What's ******* wrong with people thinking his performance is due to his injury? Why you want to correcting this type of thinking over and over again if you do not have your agenda?