- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
The name of the piece is not "Natures Furry." lolSeanibu - It's an abstract of the seasons. Nothing more. Why make it into a whole novel? Earquakes? tsunamis? tornadoes? cyclones. California, Indonesia, MidWest, NY tristate area. Stories of how they influence people is what would give it a plot.
Joe
I think I see what you are saying, although I must admit I am giggling right now at the examples given. That is pretty deep, a little over the top IMO too. My feeling on the piece is the interpretation of natures changes and effects it has, or simple as the way the land looks through the "eyes of the music." Simple eh? And what better thing to express nature than music. If you are thinking that to interpret the piece the "earth effects" as you have listed above, it is no wonder you would consider it to complicated and hard to interpret. But just as simple as the feeling you get when someone asks, "what do you feel about spring" is all the interpretation necessary for it is fundamentally a uncomplicated story of nature and no "role playing" is necessary or warranted. Hence easy to interpret in comparison to say, Carman. The freedom to express is not in the confines of characterization expectation.
, just not the Jumanji outfit.:sheesh:

, LOL.