Thanks for the award, Show

but it really should go to Doris and Sk8m8, who were there and went above and beyond the call of duty for posting after a VERY long day of watching skating. Hats off, as Dick says, to Doris and Sk8m8. Nothing like getting great reports from people who saw it live. As Doris noted a couple of times, certain things looked very different live. I know I've found that to be true for myself.
Also great comments from Nadine, Ogre Mage, Idle (quick and to the point

), and others. So many people said things that made me think, "Hmm, hadn't thought of (or noticed) that." And one of those is this comment by Doris:
Danielle Kahle is a 14 yr. old taking from Frank Carroll. She skated to a Charlie chaplin Medley, choreographed by Frank. And he had her turned out as the total reincarnation of Tara Lipinski... There is something very creepy about this. Frank is scripting Turin to have the winning rather than the 2nd place hand this time. She did a 2A, a 3S3Lp (yes, more Tara), a 3f that landed dead stopped, then tripped and fell, did OK spirals, a 3lp, a 3f with the hand down, a flying sit, a 3t2t that was kinda ugly into a good combo and scratch spin. Sound familiar?
After all that has happened to Tara's hip Frank has Danielle doing a 3sal3lp at 14? I know it's not quite as bad as the 3lp3lp on the landing hip, but this girl, at least from the SP, looks as if she does not yet have the strength or the technique to do a 3/3 edge jump combo safely. Michelle explained this so well when she talked about doing 3/3s in that article--I think it's in a thread on The Edge. Michelle, who has such perfect jump technique her jumps look as easy as MITF, is preparing to do 3t/3t by doing 3t/2t/2t precisely so she can build up the strength she needs to withstand the pressure on the landing hip. I'm all for pushing the envelope, but not at the expense of an athlete's health. How many hips of young girls doing 3/3s have to blow and end their careers before coaches and skate boot makers get the message?
Of course I don't know that Danielle will get injured and a skater can improve a lot in two years. Also, I didn't see her myself and of course I hope she stays healthy no matter what she does. Question for Doris: How did she look doing her jumps? How is her jump technique?
Interesting point, Show, about Michelle's Olympic experiences. Naturally we'll never know, but I wonder if any athlete could keep up the fire if she had two OGMs. I think it would be incredibly hard to push oneself year in and year out, and really dig down deep the way Michelle did after the '02 Olympics. I heard a comic the other night talking about how he thinks it's stupid to try to learn from "winners" because you never learn anything about yourself from wining. It's only when you lose to you learn about yourself. But who wants to listen to a loser?
It was funny, but like all good humor, it was funny because of the truth in it. Anyway, Shows comments about Michelle and the Olympics reminded me of that--although she hardly lost, she just didn't do what she expected and others expected of her.
I know the trend has been for a 15-, 16- or 17-year-old to peak right at the Olympics and beat the favorites, but I just have this feeling of destiny for an OGM with Michelle. Didn't feel it in '02, but after the '03 Nats and Worlds I felt Michelle had completely reinvented herself--and that takes guts, IMO.
Also, Nadine, I've always appreciated your point about luck. I've mostly been around dancers and writers, but it has been 30 years and I've seen too many great ones not get the breaks and too many mediocre ones either hit with something just at the right time (mostly writers) or be in the right place at the right time for the right role that turns their performing life around (mostly dancers) to NOT believe there isn't some kind of "X" factor that goes into making a champion of any kind, whether it be dancer, choreographer, writer, painter, musician, whatever. I have wondered about this with Sasha myself, that is, what is her "destiny factor" for lack of a better term? Goodness knows she's a hard worker and clearly, at least IMO, she's matured into a skater who listens carefully to her coach and tries to do exactly what she's told. OTOH, I've seen people who fail year in and year out and finally, it all falls into place. If things were different and Michelle had turned pro, Sasha would be at the top of US ladies skating, falls or no falls. Two years ago Sasha was a young and naive spitfire who was ready to take on the whole skating world. With maturity comes appreciation for reality and Sasha found out Michelle was not only staying in, she was building herself up to a whole new level. I know this is a cliche, but no matter what happens, you have to deal with the hand you're dealt. Whatever happens with Sasha, I hope Robin Wagner or someone can help her maintain and express her joy of skating because I do believe she really loves it and is just trying to balance the demands of training with maintaining that love. Both Michelle and Irina, in different ways, went through a time of questioning and came out stronger skaters for it. Others, of course, have questioned and couldn't find the key to staying in. We'll just have to see what happens.
Oh, well, always a lot of interesting issues brought up by Nationals. Seems to be a key event in affecting how fans feel about skaters, whether they live up to expectations or not, apparently depending on how they handle it or perhaps the "X" factor. We should start a thread, "The X Files" and evaluate how fate is affecting a skater's career. (Twilight Zone music, lol). Now the real question is: Tomorrow, why the heck did they schedule Scott Hamilton's special on NBC at the exact same time as the Nationals exhibitions on ABC? Crimeny!
Rgirl