- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
No, I don't hope anyone will implode. I'd love everyone to do their best and to develop themselves as fully as possible so there's as much great skating to watch as possible. But if you are imbalanced in your approach ( as they are), having achieved completely deserved success, and now seeking to have more/greater success, there's a good chance that with the pressure from that the imbalance will get more and more extreme and prove detrimental (and I would suggest you read Meagan Duhamel's blogging in various publications to see evidence of that as likely to happen). If they have got a change of personel, the thing they both need to remember is that a change of personnel is pointless unless you are also going to change as well. i hope they do; I hope they become more balanced in their approach, and I hope I see some great skating. But unless they appreciate that it is themselves that need to change (and there is nothing in their post to suggest they are looking to undertake personal change, but rather just change what they do) they are going to need a very hard-headed person in order to enforce that. And it's not that what they do - their being competitive and wanting to do really difficult technical stuff- is bad in any way shape or form (As someone who has watched ladies figure skating for however many years and seen no women really surpass technically what Kristin Yamaguchi (except maybe Mao, but there are issues there), and no-one touch Midori Ito's jumping standard, I greatly admire Meagan Duhamel for being a woman who has gone out there an pushed the technical standard as hard as she can). It is just what they do needs to be developed in different areas, and that involves developing them as people as well, and not turning up dials that are already on max.
I get the sense that nothing they do will be good enough for you (especially given some of your saltier posts earlier). What makes you think that when they go to Zimmerman they won't dial up other aspects of their skating? Please. When they switch things up and leave Gauthier, you criticize them for it, but if they continued with Richard you would criticize them for it, too. I'm not sure what you think is so "imbalanced" in their approach ... it's not exactly out of the ordinary for skaters to switch coaches, especially when losing momentum.
Other than pushing the technical envelope after years of stagnation in pairs skating, the thing that impresses me most about D/R is that they know who THEY are. They don't try to be something they're not just to pander to critics who would love to see them adapt to these critics' standards or ideals of pairs skating. They avoid warhorses -- even though that would surely be more palatable to the judges or evoke more "classic pairs skating" that the haters seems to continually criticize them for. They skate for themselves and that is truly respectable.