You're definitely free to react to Frank's opinions

I just wanted to remind everyone that Frank was probably being frank (hehe) in a very informal interview environment and not necessarily trying to be unbiased or make some kind of official indictment against Irina's skills. He was probably speaking as a starry-eyed fan like many of us do without any specific malice, but since he's such a prolific coach it might cause people to raise their eyebrows and take it more seriously than he intended.
And yes, Irina's actions are independent of Frank's but I just wanted to remind everyone so they have all the facts
Personally, I thought Irina was Michelle's greatest rival.
Thanks for your response.

I agree with the above statement about Irina being Michelle's greatest rival. In some way, I think it is quite fitting that they both ended up with the same Olympic medals. Both much-loved in each of their countries, both the inspiration for the following generation.
I understand the point you're making, but the reason I brought that specific case up is that I personally don't think 1996 is truly "controversial", which is why I think it's generous that he even described it that way to begin with. It was a close call, but controversial implies that Michelle robbed Lu Chen or that there was some huge upset like with the recent Ten-Chan debacle. There's probably far better examples of politics working in Michelle's favor than 96 worlds in my opinion.
I think that whether or not one thinks Frank is being generous by describing 1996 Worlds result as controversial depends on whether one thinks the event is controversial--and a lot of factors go into whether or not the results are seen as controversial. And your definition of controversial may differ from others. Perhaps it's just in the eye of the beholder. (For example, I was there for the men's FS at 2013 Worlds. I don't think many who were there were upset at the results at all.

) At the time, I didn't think Michelle's 96 win was controversial at all, nor did the US media--I had been super excited about Michelle Kwan since she "almost" got to go to 1994 Olympics, and big things were predicted for her even then, so when she won 1996 Worlds, it was like, "She has arrived." I didn't realize until later that for some skating fans and even for some within the skating circle, it
was controversial. Within the last year or so, there was a fan report of someone meeting Brian Orser, and for whatever reason, they discussed 1996 Worlds, and his opinion was that Lu Chen deserved to win. So, clearly, it's a competition that at the very least, some skating folks like to keep debating--it's not an open or shut case. I think you are right that there are better examples of politics working in Michelle's favor than 96 Worlds, but when I ask myself if the result would have been different if Michelle skated for China and if Lu Chen skated for the US, I'm not really sure of the answer.

In such a close competition the result could've gone either way and one would have a case for either winner. I don't think one can prove that politics played a large part, but it's also hard (for me) to say that it didn't play zero part at all. Maybe it played close to zero--but even a little bit can help in a close competition.