- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
in the statement they cited physical injuries that lead to struggles with mental health. i interpret that as a dual problem- the physical injuries have been around for some time, are still present, and likely have lead to frustration, confidence issues, dealing with not being able to train 100% or as normal, etc and they aren't feeling confident enough to compete for physical and mental reasons. i know a lot of the statement is up for our own interpretation, but i get the impression that if they can concentrate on rest/healing the physical injuries, the mental struggles will follow.I don't think it is quite that simple. USFS may have a strong preference for the appearance or "fairness" and teams fighting it out at Nationals and awarding spots based on that competition. And as others have said, you can often measure when one has healed from a physical injury but how do you objectively measure improved mental health? In this instance H/B are clearly in the top two US ice dancers . . . but what would you do if the presumptive no. 3 or no. 4 (say Green and Parsons or Carrera and Ponomerenko) withdrew for mental health concerns?
(apologies for spelling)