At this point, there is something that needs to be said. Developing your costumer base is crucial, fair enough... but when things are not doing well, you need to first and foremost, save what you have. Skaters from some nations cannot go to European challengers because their feds are not wealthy enough to send them...It means, that in one of the big feds, with a large number of women competitors who are equally talented than many I have seen yesterday at worlds (meaning they got their tech minimums somehow) , only one managed to earn her tech scores... It means that with this lack of opportunities, these women are reconsidering their investment (not just money) in the sport. The ISU needs to recognize the problem faced by skaters from North America and simply do better than that. It may look fancy to have two GPs but other competitions are very rare... Yes, worlds, but again, skaters need to qualify and there are quotas... There is absolutely no development circuit in North America that has an international context. Many small local summer events. Talking of which, CQÉ, considering the IAM contribution could have better line-ups than many challengers. The ISU needs to either find a way to provide more financial support or they need to change the structure of their series completely. I believe that the first is easier to achieve.------------
In the end, all of this is the result of a free market economy (i.e. capitalism) and the ISU like any other organisation has to make money somehow. Idealism is commendable, and we need it to develop in the right direction, but we also have to be realistic. Some things just are not possible if you have to cover your costs somehow.
And yes, thinking of the future and how to build a consumer base in the future is incredibly important, but bills also have to be paid in the present, so a balance has to be found somehow.