It also didn't occur to me that there's another option - add another 4T. And this explains some of the combo experiments he's been doing (the 3A-1L-3S/3A-1L-3F) in essence, his team is trying to zayak proof his layout as much as possible. Obviously putting another 4T means removing one of the lutzes he does now. So the layout could be something like this
4T
4T-3T
--
3A-2T
3S (3F) (currently 3Z)
3Z (currently 3F-3T)
2A
3L
3A-1L-3F (3S) (currently 3Z-1L-3S)
It's hard to completely zayak proof a two 4T layout because you'er performing other to jumps. For example a horror scenario is that he would popped all the 4Ts in 2Ts and end up zayaking that way so perhaps putting in 4S instead is more desirable. I haven't added numbers to see its worth from a BV standpoint.
***
I wonder if I still have a subscription to IFS... If so I will probably get it soon. Thanks for sharing snippets!
4T
4T-3T
--
3A-2T
3S (3F) (currently 3Z)
3Z (currently 3F-3T)
2A
3L
3A-1L-3F (3S) (currently 3Z-1L-3S)
It's hard to completely zayak proof a two 4T layout because you'er performing other to jumps. For example a horror scenario is that he would popped all the 4Ts in 2Ts and end up zayaking that way so perhaps putting in 4S instead is more desirable. I haven't added numbers to see its worth from a BV standpoint.
***
I wonder if I still have a subscription to IFS... If so I will probably get it soon. Thanks for sharing snippets!
Last edited:
Sometimes I wonder if I'm missing any good (Jason) interviews, so it's nice to have somebody post a summary here 