- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
I think some of you are missing the point here. Philosophy of judging in FS is quite different from process of judging in other sports and its more closer with evaluating students work for example. Thats because judges job is to judge quality based on not so distinctive categories which includes subjective involvement in process of judging. Thats why we are getting average opinion of 9 different opinions as something which counts (and which is different from the sum of 9 opinions) ... There would be no logic at all if current quidelines become strict rulles set in stone, because in that case there would be no need for average opinion, there would be only one judge who needs to strictly apply the rules, without judging quality of the elements the way they are judged now.