I hope Peggy's surprise guest is Kristi or Oksana or Todd Eldredge, or Matt Savoie. Hopefully it will not be Brian Boitano, the cast of Ice Princess, Christine Brennan, Irina's mom, or Meno and Sand.
Well, different strokes for different folks -- I'd LOVE for her "surprise guest" to be Brian Boitano -- I might actually watch the entire broadcast, rather than what I'm likely to do, which is tape it and then fastforward through most of it because it's not all that interesting. Unfortunately, it's not likely to be him, being that Boitano was at the Ice Princess premiere on Sunday in Hollywood. Of course, he COULD hop a plane today and get there in time, but I doubt it. Eldredge is unlikely, too, being that he's touring with Stars on Ice and I doubt could get time off to do it.
I would like to see commentators keep talk to a minimum, but use the time they do talk to give good information, like what level a spin is, or why this or that move could add points or difficulty or whatever to a move or an overall program. I'm sick of inane comments that do nothing to inform ("Oh, her costume's pretty" or "He likes sushi" or some such drivel that drowns out the music and doesn't do anything to inform). I have no problem with a commentator telling people what a move is and why it's high quality or not good quality, but the senseless stuff is really distracting and, I think, shows a lack of respect for the skater. Fluff information is fine in fluff pieces (and I have no problem with a certain number of fluff pieces to help you get to know a skater or give you an idea of what they are like off the ice, what they've overcome to get there, etc., but I do object to the same information on the same skaters over and over and over again), but not during the competition. Stick to "just the facts, ma'am" -- after all, you were supposedly hired (at least the "color commentators") because you know something about skating that the casual -- and sometimes not-so-casual -- fans don't know, so USE that knowledge to inform us.