Since much of this discussion revolves around the age of the skater, I thought I would link to and quote from an ISU ruling for a different skater and different situation related to the breaking of anti-doping rules that is relevant in how it sheds light on how doping rules/tests should be dealt with an underage skater.
At the age of 13, Yelim Kim (yes, the Yelim Kim who is competing at these Olympic games), competed at a 2016 Junior Grand Prix event. After the competition, she had gone back to the hotel. She did not know that she had been selected for anti-doping tests and that it was her responsibility to stay at the rink until the selection was complete. She returned, took the test, and tested negative.
The ISU filed a complaint against her: https://www.isu.org/inside-isu/legal/disciplinary-decisions/538-case-2016-03-ms-yelim-kim/file
I recommend reading the whole document, it's not that long. Yelim Kim received a reprimand for this incident--but could've been suspended for up to a year. The incident is not identical and certainly not proportionate to the one being discussed, but the ISU should be consistent in how it deals with the issue of age.
At the age of 13, Yelim Kim (yes, the Yelim Kim who is competing at these Olympic games), competed at a 2016 Junior Grand Prix event. After the competition, she had gone back to the hotel. She did not know that she had been selected for anti-doping tests and that it was her responsibility to stay at the rink until the selection was complete. She returned, took the test, and tested negative.
The ISU filed a complaint against her: https://www.isu.org/inside-isu/legal/disciplinary-decisions/538-case-2016-03-ms-yelim-kim/file
The Alleged Offender being a minor of the age of 13, the Panel, with no representation from the Alleged Offender, voluntarily exanimated whether Anti-Doping Rules are applicable to minors in general and to this case in particular. The Panel observes that the rules contained in the ISU Anti-Doping Rules do not specifically deal with the issue of age. The Panel is nevertheless of the view that, in order for an athlete to be bound to anti-doping rules, the issue of age is in principle of no relevance. Accordingly, the fact that the Alleged Offender was very young at the time of the anti-doping control (13 years old) is in this respect irrelevant. If a young athlete enrolls to compete in organized sport she must do it in accordance with the rules of the game, including the rules whose violation entails disciplinary consequences. This is especially appropriate in figure skating, where athletes tend to emerge onto the international scene at ever younger ages. After all, subjection to rules and to sanctions is not unknown to minors. For instance, when minors are in school, they must comply with school rules and be prepared to undergo disciplinary consequences – even harsh ones, such as the expulsion from the school or the repetition of the same school year – if they don’t. If a young athlete is deemed by his parents mature enough to participate in an international event, she must be deemed mature enough to understand the applicable anti-doping rules.
I recommend reading the whole document, it's not that long. Yelim Kim received a reprimand for this incident--but could've been suspended for up to a year. The incident is not identical and certainly not proportionate to the one being discussed, but the ISU should be consistent in how it deals with the issue of age.
