- Joined
- Jan 23, 2017
I agree that that the IOC did not really have to give a reason. If they had simply sent out a press release that the medal ceremony was delayed until, say February 13, the assumption would have probably been that they were making a nice gesture to try to see if Vincent could get out of covid jail and attend the festivities.
But instead they deliberately chose to send out a press release talking about legal issues (or whatever the phrasing was) involving a medal-winning athlete on a web site that is effectively a mouthpiece of the IOC and many other sporting governing boards, knowing what would happen once a few people noted the story on Inside the Games.
I think this might have been a last straw for them- they had tried to offer what they saw as a fair (and what many others called overly generous) rehabilitation pathway for the Russian Olympic movement and instead get a positive doping result from the athlete who everyone expected to be the biggest non-Chinese female face of the Games and well, the 21st century version of the IOC turns out to have some limits to their patience.
But instead they deliberately chose to send out a press release talking about legal issues (or whatever the phrasing was) involving a medal-winning athlete on a web site that is effectively a mouthpiece of the IOC and many other sporting governing boards, knowing what would happen once a few people noted the story on Inside the Games.
I think this might have been a last straw for them- they had tried to offer what they saw as a fair (and what many others called overly generous) rehabilitation pathway for the Russian Olympic movement and instead get a positive doping result from the athlete who everyone expected to be the biggest non-Chinese female face of the Games and well, the 21st century version of the IOC turns out to have some limits to their patience.