Mathman said:
I looked on the USFSA web site under Code of Conduct. The only relevant thing I found was: [snip]
There's also the United States Olympic Committee's Code of Ethics:
http://www.olympic-usa.org/education/ethics.pdf
Excerpts:
=============
Principle B: Integrity
[...] Coaches avoid improper and potentially harmful dual relationships.
ETHICAL STANDARDS
[...]
1.08 Sexual Harassment [very similar to what you quoted from USFSA web site]
[...]
1.14 Exploitative Relationships
(a) Coaches do not exploit athletes or other participants over whom they have supervisory, evaluative, or other authority.
(b) Coaches do not engage in sexual/romantic relationships with athletes or other participants over whom they have evaluative, direct, or indirect authority, because relationships are likely to impair judgment or be exploitative.
3.04 Sexual Intimacies With Current Athletes
Coaches do not engage in sexual intimacies with current athletes.
3.05 Coaching Former Sexual Partners
Coaches do not coach athletes with whom they have engaged in sexual intimacies.
3.06 Sexual Intimacies With Former Athletes
(a) Coaches should not engage in sexual intimacies with a former athlete for at least two years after cessation or termination of professional services.
(b) Because sexual intimacies with a former athlete are so frequently harmful to the athlete, and because such intimacies undermine public confidence in the coaching profession and thereby deter the public's use of needed services, coaches do not engage in sexual intimacies with former athletes even after a two-year interval except in the most unusual circumstances. The coach who engages in such activity after the two years following cessation or termination of the coach-athlete relationship bears the burden of demonstration that there has been no exploitation, in light of all relevant factors, including:
1. the amount of time that has passed since the coach-athlete relationship terminated,
2. the circumstances of termination,
3. the athlete's personal history,
4. the athlete's current mental status,
5. the likelihood of adverse impact on the athlete and others, and
6. any statements or actions made by the coach during the course of the athlete-coach relationship suggesting or inviting the possibility of a post-termination sexual or romantic relationship with the athlete or coach.
=============