Okay, I'll stick my hand in the fire. Forced to make a choice if a 13-year-old girl was already pregnant by a 20-year-old guy, which do you think would be the best for all involved?
1. Have the couple divorce or have the marriage annulled (I know, tough with a child; but didn't Ted Kennedy get one from Joan after 20 years and three kids?) and give the child up for adoption.
2. Same first part as above but have the girl's parents raise the child until she finishes high school or reaches 18, whichever comes first, and can go on welfare as a single mother.
3. Abortion is not an issue here, and without at all meaning to sound like a smart-a** (at least one child's future is at stake, possibly two if you count the mother) but not all that many decades ago and still in some parts of the country, when a 12 or 13-year-old girl got/gets pregnant, her father and brothers hunted down the husband for the proverbial shotgun wedding. I'm not trying to make a joke at all; I lived 11 years in Utah where thousands of 12 and 13-year-old girls were married off to 40 and 50-year-old polygamist men with other wives. Same happens in northern Arizona, southern Idaho, probably other states, and certainly other parts of the world.
I'm curious as to what people think. IMO, this kind of thing happens all the time; it's just that either the girl isn't quite as young or the guy quite as old or if they are, it's a community where a couple of such marriages a year are just accepted.
For me, this story brings parental rights to choose for their underage child, differing state laws, political family values, and biology crashing right into each other. And you can bet the politicians (on all sides) will try to make hay from it. You can only make laws to stop this kind of thing to a certain extent. As someone else said, neither young parent is very bright and maybe they're happy living a not very bright life, which I say in all seriousness.
I agree we need to protect barely pubescent girls from sex and marriage with 18 and older men with laws; but in a situation like this, when the wedding cake has already long been digested, is it better to disrupt lives and throw the guy in jail or send him to some kind of training program so he can get a job, which includes a big long talk by a huge scary judge saying, "Son, if you ever even LOOK at a 12-year-old girl again that way, we'll slam it in the slammer and you dang well know what I mean by IT!"
"Soy un perdedor, I'm a loser baby so why don't you kill me?"
R-Beck