These North American and Russian commentators can learn a few things from British Eurosport's humor and general good will towards all skaters.
It's much easier to be impartial and fun when all you have to root for is Coomes/Buckland.
These North American and Russian commentators can learn a few things from British Eurosport's humor and general good will towards all skaters.
It's much easier to be impartial and fun when all you have to root for is Coomes/Buckland.
It's much easier to be impartial and fun when all you have to root for is Coomes/Buckland.
He never gave a clear reasoning. Just something like "Y/J are a good team, but S/B were better on the night." I guess because Y/J were a little tight on the twist and one throw? Anyway, it's rather incomprehensible to me.
Taking Browning and CBC's coverage as a whole, throughout the season, I do think there is a somewhat anti-Russian slant. His comments about Artur Gachinski during SA, I felt, were more 'disrespectful' than what Trankov said about D/R (Trankov seems to just come out and say, "they're not two skating as one." Browning is rather backhanded and passive-aggressive).
Their Worlds preview clearly had a "support the Americans" vibe. Liza got in-depth coverage for being GPF/European champion, obviously, but they were rather misleading about Elena (saying she didn't do as well as they expected, and her jumps got smaller as she grew taller--instead of, y'know, the truth: she's been landing all her jumps the whole season and only lost because Liza was even better). Anna got no coverage at all. Whereas the American ladies were all mentioned by name, all received individual commentary and descriptions, ect.
Granted, I suspect most of this isn't Browning's fault. CBC probably has requirements. Browning and Lane both seem to personally like Elena. I just find CBC's entire coverage--excessively pro-Canadian, incomprehensibly pro-American when Canadians aren't contenders--not to my liking this year. (I did like their coverage of the Olympics, btw).
I don't think Duhamel was laughing at all. I think she has been hurt by Trankov's comments. The topic is written to look like a click-worthy headline.
Perhaps a more constructive discussion would be how to bring out D&R's style that would be authentic to their skills. They are not your typical classically elegant pair which many fans have enjoyed and hold as the standard for pairs skating. At the moment, their identity is based on TES and good PCS skills to execute them. Their choreography is generic and has little to do with their unique personality.
We've seen and know their style. Not much will work...
.but they're really just an ordinary blah team.
I don't think Duhamel was laughing at all. I think she has been hurt by Trankov's comments. The topic is written to look like a click-worthy headline.
Perhaps a more constructive discussion would be how to bring out D&R's style that would be authentic to their skills. They are not your typical classically elegant pair which many fans have enjoyed and hold as the standard for pairs skating. At the moment, their identity is based on TES and good PCS skills to execute them. Their choreography is generic and has little to do with their unique personality.
He's complaining because they don't skate as if they're a pair, and they lack many of the intrinsic qualities of a pair. This long into their career leads me to believe they don't even care about this part, and it gives them a janky look. And his commentary is as valid as a broadcast commentator's.
Considering I've seen people on the forums call her dumpy and refer to how never in her career has she hit a pretty position, the comments she gets are pretty harsh. She can't change her body type or anything and it's easy to just tell someone just to get over it. It's not easy to get over comments like that over something like that where what they are criticizing is beyond her control. She can't change her body type.
I will say this though, instead of working on big tricks, they should work on getting their lines to match more and they're packed with transitions that do nothing for the music. I don't feel they have much connection to the music, people argue they're doing harder tech to emphasize their strengths and minimize their weaknesses but by working from the bottom up there's a lot they can do to hide more of their weaknesses to make them look more cohesive as a pair.