I don't think "well, it's convenient for me at this moment in my life" is a good selling point. I mean for the country you'd like to join.
Not to mention offhandedly referring to citizenship in said country as a "paper."
Also, not to mention that when you become a citizen, the country you'd like to continue loving is no longer "your" country. You have a new one.
I'm not arguing against NEVER changing citizenship. But I am arguing against it for the sake of convenience or athletic expediency.
Or you have two now. I was involved with a Syrian family who came to Canada as refugees. They don't stop loving Syria or feeling attached to it, but they've come to love Canada too. Different situation obviously, but my point is you can love two countries at once in my opinion.
Most athletes are getting dual citizenship, save for those from countries that don't allow it like Kavaguti who had to give up Japanese citizenship.
People feel a variety of ways about citizenship and what that means to them.
I think this is a super important point. It's different for different people.
I suppose that's true. Here's a relevant Wikipedia article, and it appears the rules wildly vary around the world:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_citizenship
Notably, as far as American citizenship goes, " United States requires applicants for naturalization to swear to an oath renouncing all prior "allegiance and fidelity" to any other nation or sovereignty as part of the naturalization ceremony."
"Renouncing your allegiance and fidelity" may be part of the oath, but you are still allowed to have other citizenships, and so obviously you are not actually renouncing your allegiance. My parents are immigrants and still are citizens of their birthplace, I believe my uncle has two other citizenships in addition to his American one, as does my grandmother.
Personally, I think that it would be better for the IOC to drop the citizenship requirement. Skaters from small federations often have no choice but to search abroad for partners, and even in countries where there is an abundance of talent, sometimes your perfect match is still abroad. Canada and America have traded skaters back and forth for awhile, for instance.
Personally, I think it's kind of a silly oath, considering the US is fine with dual citizenship. Like
chameleon says, it's not actually true. You aren't really renouncing anything. If I were ever to get US citizenship, I'd think it was stupid and I probably wouldn't really want to say it, but it wouldn't really matter because I wouldn't be doing it. That line anyways would just be words, since I would still be a dual citizen. I would be gaining a country, not losing one. And
TontoK, on the question you asked 4everchan in a later post, I'm proud to be Canadian, and I wouldn't ever actually "renounce my allegiance and fidelity" to Canada. But no matter what the oath says, I just don't view getting dual citizenship as doing that.
well... maybe it's a generation or cultural thing... we don't have military service in canada for instance.... many of us also don't really think the queen is all that cool,unless she is on small pieces of paper that allow us to buy stuff.
I think this is a good point. For example, in my experience (and I know a lot of people who agree), Americans tend to be way more patriotic than Canadians. I don't mean that people aren't proud to be Canadian or anything, but I think that overall patriotism is a much bigger part of American culture than Canadian culture. And then you have the idea of the American "melting pot" vs the Canadian "mosaic". Those are generalizations obviously, and I don't think either country is entirely one or the other, but I do think there are different views on multiculturalism between the two countries. And it's not about one being better, but those differences probably have some affect on the different views regarding citizenship.