- Joined
- Mar 28, 2012
It's not so much about liking or disliking a skater--I dislike very few skaters, and appreciate the work of every skater. Of course they all have personality of some sort, but I'm talking about the public persona they project on ice and in interviews. These are where the casual audience get an opportunity to relate to the skater outside of what they put on the ice. The federation seems to often favor skaters who tend to come across rehearsed and bland in interviews over those with strong personalities--like Ashley, who is spunky and not afraid to speak her mind--and I think that is a shame. As much as I love the skating of Meryl and Charlie, for example, they are incredibly boring interviewees. If I hadn't seen them goofing around in the Shibsibs videos, I'd think they really are bland and boring outside the rink...
Fair. But I think most skaters come across that way because questions asked in post-performance interviews and press conferences are bland. I cannot count how often I've heard "What do you think about your performance?", "What is it like to perform in front of a home audience at Nationals?", "What do you think about your personal development as a skater in the past 2-3-4 years?", "Did you awesome skate come as a surprise to you?", "Are you disappointed by the mistakes you made?" and so on. It's hard to show your personality in such an interview. And it's exactly these interviews that will be broadcasted to the wider public. At least I doubt they'll show Social Scene type of interviews on National news. Sure you can show off your personality outside of this on Social Media and so on, and depending how controversial your statements are (or on how popular and accomplished a person you are) what you said may make the news. As far as the standard interviews are concerned I'm afraid it's more a fault of the ever-the-same questions.