- Joined
- Feb 5, 2004
Great debate!Each of you has me convinced you're right ... until I read the next rebuttal.
I think I am going to side with Zuranthium because skating is the most individual of sports - you really want to know if this individual is the best in the world, at least at the moment of competition. And the matches are very few in number. So you really need/want him/her to compete against the best... not just those who got a lucky draw. Otherwise, the victory is rather meaningless.
I'm not so sure the victory is meaningless. Is Sasha's one gold at nationals meaningless because Kwan wasn't there?
Is Meissner's world gold meaningless because Arakawa and Slutskaya weren't there?
Should Czisney not have been allowed at the GPF last year because actually Skate America and Skate Canada were flukes and she's never seen that form again?
I think the spirit of the orginal rules is a good one (that the winner of each competition should have final face off in the final) taking the six highest scores (or combination of two scores) would be ok if the scores could be directly compared. I know that this hasn't happened this year but you have to make a rule that can be applied going forwards. What if next year the top 4-8 marks are within 3 points of each other, or the difference between throwing one judges marks out over another? Then how do you "fairly" decide who gets to go?
Ant
Each of you has me convinced you're right ... until I read the next rebuttal.
Just don't listen to the ones that bash you! They're just envious! 
) why is that? does anyone know? If B&A are being marked low for a boring, overdone, non-modern dance - then why are the French even lower for taking a risk, having an original program & the best costumes in the entire history of ice dance?? Its very confusing...