Red Dog said:
I see it like this: Just because all As are Bs doesn't mean all Bs are As. So, if you are a fan of someone, IMO it implies some sort of connection, but just because you have a connection to someone does not imply that you are a fan of that person. See what I mean?
I'm not sure i really do follow, but later on i was reading Dee's post and i think i do agree with you about the connection, though i would say this, the connection isn't necessarily to do with the skater and more to do with what they actually do on the ice (and thinking about it, often the music - which might speak to me for different reasons). An example - Kostner, who's competitive programs i've not really enjoyed for the last couple of seasons as much as i used to. But her Ave Maria exhibition remains one of the highlights of Torino for me - the flowing beautiful edges and the lines she hits, that's equisite skating and moved me...connection to the skater....not so much because half the time (like the "shhh" moments in last years LP i want to leap on the ice slap her and say "you're 18 years old not 8, stop that!" and then fly to canada and slap Kurt Browning around for giving her such childish choreography!).
Red Dog said:
There are some performances that leave me with the impression of "That's very good!" Examples include Shizuka's 06 Olympic LP and 04 Worlds FS, Cohen's Olympic SP and 04 Worlds SP, and Suguri's 06 Olympic LP. (note: this is by all means not a comprehensive list.) But I'm not moved by these performances. There's not that extra element of feeling in them, IMO. I think the closest I've come to actually "being moved" was MK's 03 nationals FS. And that's saying a lot because all her performances since then have been, IMO, very bland.
You mean you weren't moved by Irina's LP at worlds in Moscow?? Come on RD, do you have a heart of stone?? How can you not be moved by that performance and her reaction immediately afterwards?!!! Seriously though, i can see why you might not be moved by skating. You describe yourself as more of a casual observer than a die hard fan. I wouldn't be moved by anything i only cared a tiny bit about. I'm much more invested in skating therefore i'm more likely to be moved and as you rightly point out, a skater like Michelle or Irina who i've been watching for over ten years and come to like a lot are more likely to get a "short cut" to move me than others....though B&S i think moved me to tears the first time i ever saw them....i think the SP they did at Europeans in the gold outfits...WOW! IN that circumstance i knew nothing about the skaters, i watched what they did on the ice and it moved me...totally aside from them as people it was a pure skating thing not a skater/personality thing.
Red Dog said:
Well, it's basically impossible to be completely 100% objective. Just being human prevents that from happening- EVERYONE has some sort of bias. In order to be objective you'd have to report facts and ONLY facts. There will always be something that will set you off. In my case it's people who like to jump to conclusions.
In that case we agree, what i would say is that i don't think my fandom stops me from evaluating other skater's performances, or from looking at my favourites performances...in fact i would say my fandom has often had me judge Kwan's programs more harshly than others because i expect so much more of her than others. And people jumping to conclusions was my point about people making ridiculous statements on how skaters are feeling, or what there strategy is, and stating it as a fact when the skater has made no such statement.
Red Dog said:
If you were to be totally "objective" re Kwan (meaning can hear anything about her without "shutting down") you would be able to hear anything and not feel any real emotion about it. Still, in my case, sometimes it's hard for me to do this because of some of the people making the comments.
I disagree, i don't think being objective means being emotionless, i think it means being able to understand what's being said to you and understand why. In my line of work i have to hear all manner of statements and understand them...i nearly always have my own opinion on them which does not always correlate to that of my client but have to act on my clients wishes. I can hear any statement about Kwan and be objective about it, i can also have my own opinions. If i think the statement is well reasoned then i'll let it lie if it requires further explanation then i might question further. The stand alone statement "Michelle Kwan is a slow spinner" i think is not entirely correct, i might ask "compared to who", "in which spins", i might then say - have you seen any skaters outside of the final flight, cos i think michelle spoins faster than most of them (excluding Sarah Meier!) and then maybe pose the wild idea that actually Michelle isn't a slow spinner, she's just slower than a handful of other people who are pretty damned skilled at spinning.
Red Dog said:
I kind of AM a once-in-4-years fan in a sense: I watched in 1998, came back for 02, followed skating up to 06, watched in 06, and regardless of whether there is enough to keep me interested between now and 10, I will definitely be watching the ladies competition again in Vancouver. And again in 2014. And so on.
But there isn't one skater in particular who I'm constantly interested in. It's sort of a combination of all the skaters. Once the current crop of skaters retires, unless I warm up to the new competitors I'm finished with following skating.
Well ok, but i just don't get why you bother watching skating, if you're not a fan of the sport or of a particular person. And we all have to go through the post Olympic thought process of - well a lot of my favourites have retired, some of whom i've been watching competitively for over ten years, so who do i like now? Honeslty in the Men's i've been reeling since Yags left...no one has filled that void, but some skaters have through for magic moments but none enough to say i'm a fan.
Ant (who hasn't even attempted to proof read this long post!)