and to be clear i was the one who actually requested the change.
until there is proof that there was a conspiracy, it's just speculation. there is a good indication that things were crooked, but not proof.
i also felt the 'conspiracy' bit of it was driving the conversation the wrong way. whether or not there was a conspiracy, the fact remains that the judging was biased and unfair. as far as the conspiracy goes, no one seems to have an adequate answer as to how an investigation can even get started. if there's no investigation, it doesn't matter whether or not there was a conspiracy. get one started, and we'll get the thread name changed back
until there is proof that there was a conspiracy, it's just speculation. there is a good indication that things were crooked, but not proof.
i also felt the 'conspiracy' bit of it was driving the conversation the wrong way. whether or not there was a conspiracy, the fact remains that the judging was biased and unfair. as far as the conspiracy goes, no one seems to have an adequate answer as to how an investigation can even get started. if there's no investigation, it doesn't matter whether or not there was a conspiracy. get one started, and we'll get the thread name changed back

