and to be clear,
is all they have to 'prove' that is was unfair, for the results to be thrown out? or do you think they would have to have proof of an actual conspiracy?
i would think having proof that it was unfair judging alone would do it, which would be much easier than getting proof of conspiracy, but idk
is all they have to 'prove' that is was unfair, for the results to be thrown out? or do you think they would have to have proof of an actual conspiracy?
i would think having proof that it was unfair judging alone would do it, which would be much easier than getting proof of conspiracy, but idk