It's not a 6.0 system. Most of your points were about 6.0. This is code of points. The commentary from Hamilton seems to be:
This time the judges were looking for x.
Last time they were looking for y.
Under any system, whatever the judges are "looking for" (favoring), sometimes the x skater who has a bigger advantage in x than the y skater has in y.
Jumps vs. artistry is a major oversimplification, but for shorthand as an example, sometimes the better jumper had a big jump advantage and the better artist has a smaller artistic advantage. Other times the better artist has the bigger advantage and the jumper's margin on the jumps is narrower.
Some judges may give more weight to X and others to Y. Changes in the rules or the scoring system or the referee's instructions may cause the same judge to weight X more highly at one competition and Y at the next. And, yes, which country the X skater and the Y skater happen to represent each time might improperly influence how heavily a judge weights X vs. Y.
Kurt's comments were succinct and measured, but they were also honest and critical. He gave Adelina full compliment for her technical quality, but put everything in the proper context. Scott's analysis on the other hand did not adhere to the spirit of the scoring system. To even mention Adelina's jump advantage in the free without mentioning Yuna's jump advantage in the short is downright unethical. No person can say EVERYTHING in the heat of the moment, but he had several opportunities in the following days to clarify that point, and he never did.
So maybe Kurt is a better commentator than Scott? So what? Neither of them controls the results.
Which skater they each prefer, or how much they question or agree with the results on air, has no bearing on the results either. Learn what you can from what they have to say -- which is not much because their on-air comments are limited in time and directed toward the casual viewers -- and if you want to keep track you can add their expressed opinions about who should have won to a tally of North American TV commentators and skating experts as to whether they agree with the result or not.
None of that tells you whether the judges on the panel that day judged fairly or not. Maybe they did, maybe they didn't, but whether Kurt or Scott agrees with them has no bearing on that question.
