chuckm said:
The problem is Irina made two blatant errors in the Worlds 2005 SP and still wound up first by virtue of PCS scores, even though 3 other skaters had no errors. And that was in the SHORT program. At Worlds 2005, she did legitimately win the FS and the competition.
But the same thing could happen at Torino: Irina not being clean in the SP and winning it anyway, and then not being clean in the FS and winning that, too, despite other skaters turning in two clean programs with great skates. No other lady skater gets 8s in PCS, and judges give her those huge scores even when her skating doesn't rate them. It would be easy for Irina to walk away with the OGM even if others skate better than she does.
PRE-DECIDING A COMPETITION IS CHEATING. Period. Judges are supposed to mark on what they see in front of them, and under CoP, they are supposed to mark the tech scores AND the PCS scores based on actual PERFORMANCE, not REPUTATION.
The PCS scores are indeed based on actual performance and are supposed to reflect what are listed in the ISU criteria for each component, be it Skating Skills, Choreography, Performance/Execution, Transitions, or Interpretation. Except for the "execution" part of Performance/Execution, it should not matter if the skater makes mistakes, unless those mistakes interfere with the criteria of each component. In the example you cited from '05 Worlds, I assume you're talking about the top four skaters in the SP: Irina, Sasha, Michelle, and Carolina.
Irina's lowest PCS scores were in Transitions/Linking Footwork, but so were everybody else's (I stopped looking after the top eight). So Transitions are a wash. BTW, because T/LFW was lowest for at least the top 8 skaters, IMO the ISU either needs to explain it better in the COP so the skaters can improve on it or explain it better to the judges so they know what to look for. If your placement is directly correlated to your mean PCS score on T/LFW, something's a'miss. But it wasn't enough to make me think "Cheating!" or "Conspiracy!" It was only enough to make me think "COP really only in its first full year of use."
Irina's next lowest mean PCS score was in Performance/Execution, 7.50,
as they should be since she flubbed her first and last Technical Elements, thus negatively impacting her P/E. Sasha's mean P/E scores were 7.64, which, IMO, is as it should be since I find her to be a strong performer and she made no mistakes other than going over the time limit, which was reflected in the -1.00 Time Deduction.
Irina's next lowest mean PCS score, 7.61, was in Choreography/Composition. Sasha's was 7.48, Michelle's 7.18, and Cara's 6.89. I didn't think any of the top 4 had very good choreography in '05, and though I think a case could be made for Sasha's LP having less repetition, Irina's jumps were more difficult, as was her circular FW. This is the PCS I think is most open to subjective interpretation and needs the most work on the wording of each element. OTOH, on TV it's difficult if not impossible to see the way the skater uses the ice. Does she just skate back and forth with an occasional diagonal for a Lutz entrance? Or are there are lot of 8s, 3s, and loops, along with straightline skating? Are jumps, spins, and the other Technical Elements part and parcel of the choreography? To me they are. I know I can't sit there and think, "Spiral sequence--not choreography. Groovy variation on Ina Bauer--choreography." Anyway, C/C needs work, IMO.
(Joe, I bet you remember the Danny Kaye song and dance "They're Doin' Choreography" from a film whose name escapes me. But I bet most of us remember Robin Williams doing his 30-second, "And Fosse! And Fosse! Martha Graham, Martha Graham! Michael Kidd, Michael Kidd! And Twyla! And Twyla!" from "The Birdcage.")
For Interpretation, Irina's mean PCS was 7.64; Sasha, 7.57; Michelle, 7.43; and Cara, 6.89.
For Skating Skills, Irina's mean PCS was 7.79; Sasha 7.68; Michelle 7.46; and Cara 7.18.
What I think would make more sense to do than comparing different skaters at a single event (this isn't directed at you Chuck; it's a suggestion for anyone who wants to see if there is bias judging in the PCS scores) is to follow the mean PCS scores of three skaters throughout the '04 GPS and '05 Worlds. They could either be skaters you have a hunch are being held up or down or just three different skaters. Heck, you can do them all if you want. But I think three would be sufficient to give you an idea if there is a bias towards Russian skaters. I realize Irina didn't compete during the GPS last season and she seems to be the one all the hub-bub's about.
Finally, and I know I'm guilty of doing this myself, but Chuck, could you please use your
inside CAPS voice in these posts instead of your
outside CAPS voice?

I know, I annoy you no end.
Rgirl