but how are the coaches supposed to teach students not to leave your toe pick on the ice more than 90 degrees?
Well it should be 180 degrees as the set amount, not 90. Although if someone can do toepick jumps with just 90 degrees pre-rotation (mainly the Lutz and Flip, it's not exactly ideal for the Toeloop), that's great. It's not hard to teach either, every skater with correct technique already does this. The skater needs to be taught to stay straighter during the takeoff and vault with the free leg, rather than dragging around to spin off the ice. 90 degrees as the minimum
could be taught even for toepick jumps, but I don't think that much restriction is necessary, even if it is how the Lutz and Flip should really be done.
Can anyone show me a 3/3 loop combo where the second loop isn't crazily pre-rotated?
Eric Millot 3Lo+3Lo
Kurt Browning 3S+3Lo
These were the first ones ever done in competition and they managed to do it back when there wasn't extra technology to help take apart and analyze jumps.
Regarding the topic of the thread in general, I think people are being WAY too nitpicky. I know pre-rotation is a thing, but there are TONS of ladies who do it, including at the elite level, and if we were to scrutinize each one on each jump, we'd be here all day.
This makes no sense at all. Yes, many ladies are doing something that is WRONG. Just because something is popular, that doesn't make it right. Just because something harmful is legal, that doesn't mean it should remain that way. It doesn't take that much time to scrutinize jumps. The pre-rotations are a big issue mostly on the back-end part of jump combinations (but jump techniques from people like Satako Miyahara and Shoma Uno, who pre-rotate their Lutz and Flip more than 180 degrees, also need to be scrutinized). Moreover, if this was actually STANDARDIZED by the ISU, then it would start resolving itself.
And I also think Evgenia is getting extra scrutiny when somebody like Wagner isn't getting a similar thread. Especially interesting this thread is made when the OP has continually expressed UR outrage regarding skaters like Murakami, when Medvedeva's jumps are most definitely more sufficiently rotated by comparison.
Evgenia isn't getting extra scrutiny. EVERYONE else already gets scrutinized and the issues of UR's from people like Wagner are something that has constantly been talked about for a long time. And she is getting correct calls on her jumps, for the most part. But now with Evgenia we have a VERY clear example of a wrong call being made based on reputation and of incorrect technique being rewarded. Her 3S+3T at Skate Canada is indefensible (barely more than 2 rotations in the air) and her 3F+3T on the second part of the combination wasn't much better in terms of the rotation, it was just landed cleanly.
This is a huge problem for the entire sport because many of the Junior level skaters are doing it and it's just seen as normal. This will be a never-ending outcry until it is fixed in the ISU rules and until the tech panels start making correct calls. Bad technique like this can not be allowed to persist. Both because it is less pleasing visually and because it is unfair to other people who are actually getting MORE rotation (and amplitude) in their jumps, via their correct technique, and then getting crazily punished for slight underrotations, while the people with worse technique who are rotating less are not punished and are able to be more consistent at the same time.
Also, Medvedeva's jumps are not at all more rotated than Murakami's were. Stop your usual routine of trying to use the protocol sheets as some kind of infallible defense (and you pick and choose when to do this, which makes it entirely hypocritical). Murakami was frequently called for UR's on toeloops and loops that were within 90 degrees of fully rotated, simply because she was labelled as a skater who didn't have great overall jump technique. 2011 Worlds, 2012 Skate Canada (this competition ESPECIALLY and
this jump especially being called was ludicrous), 2013 Worlds, and 2014 Worlds are all examples people can look at and see.
Look at ANY of Murakami's 3Toe+3Toe combinations from start to finish and they have equal or better rotation than any of Medvedeva's +3Toe combinations. Not to mention having more height too. The same can be said for many of Rika Hongo's jumps at this recent competition too - her 3Toe+3Toe in the SP was better rotated than Medvedeva's combination and her 2Axel+3Toe in the LP was better rotated than Medvedeva's 3Sal+3Toe, yet the calls were opposite of this. Then of course the lunacy of Hongo's 3F+3T being called as << and Medvedeva's getting full credit, when in reality Medveda's combo was only a few degrees more rotated.