I personally have a problem about the secrecy around this. Canadian Canoe double olympic medallist and I believe 8 times world champion Laurence Vincent-Lapointe
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurence_Vincent-Lapointe tested positive for a very small quantity of a banned substance. With her lifelong experience as a top level athlete, she knew she hadn't done anything wrong. She and the federation were outspoken about it. Her test had happened just prior to the World Championships as well, and instead of saying she had w/d for personal reasons, they told the truth loud and clear. Investigation took part. In the end, there had been a cross contamination (body fluids) from her ex-boyfriend who had been using a banned substance (not a competing athlete).
Why is it important to be outspoken?
1) It cuts down the speculation about injuries, split partnerships, and so many other gossips...
2) it shows right away the support of the federation willing to help the athlete clearing their names
3) it helps other athletes who may have similar bad lucks and educates both athletes and WADA about potential flaws in the doping code.
4)it sends a clear message to all athletes that they will not be able to fly under the radar... if their name is cleared, that's great... If not, then everyone knows there was a doping violation
Hiding the doping violation while it is being investigating led to a whole lot of speculating in this particular case. Also, if ever the athlete had been found guilty and lost their appeal, the doping violation may have been hidden forever. I do not believe that hiding a doping violation is helping anyone.. Saving face here is not going to help the athlete... If the athlete is guilty, well they will remain guilty... If the athlete is not guilty, then their name will be cleared. When a federation hides these kinds of news, it sends a very odd message out. It also does not provide a public support to the athlete which is very much needed when they go through extremely long and difficult times during the investigation processes.
Often, the athletes are lost and confused when something like this happens... and knowing that other similar cases have happened are extremely helpful. As Laurence Vincent-Lapointe explained, they had to test everything she had used to see where the problem was coming from. They were finding nothing. She had not changed her diet... etc... They found out the the ex-boyfriend had been using that drug when they tested his hair. If a similar case happens to someone else, they would know where to start the investigation. I believe when an athlete appeals a doping violation, they have the responsibility to prove that they are not at fault. Proving that can be extremely difficult. The more information that is shared, the better it is for the athletes. As a matter of fact, if I read correctly, a similar case happened to a wrestler/fighter and that may have helped Jessica in clearing her name.
I believe it is very important to speak up right away about such matters, and that the federation needs to support their athletes in such circumstances. Thankfully for Jessica, she will be able to compete and I wish she will qualify. They are my favourite American pairs team and I am happy to know that in the end, there was no injury or other major problems. Too bad about missing worlds last year, and this leading to a whole lot of speculations about "the fed not supporting them"... actually the speculations were right in some ways... the federation may have provided some support but they didn't do it openly. I believe this could have been handled much better. YMMV