- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
It sounds like the Tara Lipinski effect to me. I unfortunately was never a big supporter of the view that spaz and spunk should equate to heightened second mark scores. Unfortunately it is a view the judges have embraced, and Lipinski and the Hughes sisters are pinnacles of evidence of this.
I totally disagree with you here kitty. Flaring up a program with facial movements such as smiling (when it is appropriate), eye movements, being happy and even sad at times, if it helps sell the program then it enhances the value of the program. I believe choreography goes alot deeper then properly timed arm waves and crossovers that land on the beat of the music. Skaters with great charisma on the ice are what I love. As I stated, they should sell the program as much as they can, and should therefore be rewarded for those spunky movements, they may not be things they do with their skates but they unquestionably increase the overall performance value.