- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
Patrick's blade work is head and shoulders above anyone else. One of the flaws in the judging system is that that kind of spread isn't adequately reflected. Even if his nearest competitor were to get 8 and he got 10, that's only a two point difference - less than 2% of the total mark
Since there is a ceiling for PCS, the inflation has narrowed the gap between the others and Patrick as there is no room for his to inflate along. Also, PCS is capped at 100, supposedly the approximate upper limit for TES as well. Yet with more quads and sometimes inflated GOEs, TES has gone over 100 for some, including Patrick. Thus, PCS is no more equally important as TES, especially since no way anybody would be given a perfect 100 in PCS. Yeah, Patrick's superb blade work is not sufficiently rewarded and reflected in scores. Yet he is inclining to be greater in artistry and performance in his skating as his legacy. However, we will be the lucky ones to receive such gifts from him.