I totally agree! Look at Yagudin and Plushenko's "success rate", not a total number of medals and you'll know that Yagudin is a winner (maybe an absolute one)!
Yagudin's taken part in 6 World Championships - 4 golds, 1 silver (with the twisted ankle) and 1 bronze (his first Worlds - he'd just turned 17), he's competed in 2 OG - the fifth despite the high temperature, and Gold in SLC, plus 2x Gold in GPF (Plushenko beat him there only once!), plus 3x Gold, 2x Silver at Euros etc. All this within only 6-year-long senior career.
And if I'm not mistaken, he's still the only one to win the "big four" during one season - GPF, Euros, OG, Worlds. What more do you Plushyfan and others want?
And that Yagudin's never won Nationals? He's always claimed - who cares you are a Russian champion? WCH and OG is what matters and he's deadly right! He always tried to be in the best shape at these competitons, not at some Nationals.
And how can Plushyfan say Yagudin hasn't brought anything to fig. skating? And what about his footwork (only later did Plushenko and others try to copy him), what about his incredibly high triple Axel, his passion, artristy, his fighting instinct (I don't think there's any other skater who'd be able to skate through such horrible pain as he was(and still he is).
How many programs of other skaters can people remember? But everybody remembers Yagudin's Winter, Gladiator, Man in the Iron Mask... It's not his fault he had to quit his eligible career so early. He would never have quit so early if his hip hadn't been destroyed so badly (ask T. Tarasova about how difficult it was for Alexei to make this desicion and how long it took him to get over it).
I think we should judge skaters by means of success rate and if people can remember some of their programs and not how many titles they have when everybody has rather a differently long career... Actually, I don't believe it's possible to make a list of best skaters, skating in different eras, in different scoring systems etc. We can only say who we like and why