- Joined
- Mar 26, 2014
The truth is, many people, including people in the figure skating world never tried to understand what SS are defined by ISU and what judges are looking for while evaluating skating skills in one skaters program. They are looking at Michele Kwan or Yuna Kim programmes and think - that is how everyone need to skate to have good marks for SS. Which is complitely wrong. The truth is - You can demonstrate good SS in many different ways, and they can all look different. But SS are certanly not being esteticaly pleasing while doing a cross overs. I'm amazed how many people believe that is what SS are :noshake:
I see that there could be misunderstanding. From the context some people meant SS to be Step Sequence - others Skating Skills. Speaking about the former for the last time as I already said it more than once. I would not mind increasing the weight of SS but only with coming accountability from the panel about the reasons for level deduction.
I rewatched Sasha's and Rika's SS during Skate Canada SP. Yes, Rika's performance was more fluid and I liked it better. But we have GOE for that. As for the elements I could not see any striking differences between the two sets of SS elements. I watched Sasha's SS at 0.25 speed. It looked like she did everything that was planned - I could not catch any missteps or missed elements. I am sure that Eteri and David did not plan level 2 SS for her. The question is where were her mistakes? They had to be very obvious because level 2 appeared just a second after her steps finished. If those mistakes that cost 2 levels are so obvious that tech guys don't need to think about them just name it like you say "UR" or "wrong edge". This will be especially important if the value of SS is going to be increased as some people suggest.

