- Joined
- Feb 18, 2019
It turns out even on a desktop I don't know how to link to a previous post. Oh wellIt's Post 204 on page 11.
And I'm not really looking to change anyone's mind, because I won't. And I'm not saying the studies are there now, I'm saying wait until we have studies.
But as I've said before, I only return because I wouldn't want what is my, and others, honestly held belief to be mislabeled as jealousy, or sexualization, or anything like that.
And now I really willeace: out
Lets say that we did have studies saying that quads negatively affected young girls. Or intense physical activity, or whatever you want to say. I pose the same question. How would changing the age limit change that? Junior competitions still exist. Girls still do the same jumps there, at about the same number of competitions per year. And to be at a high level as an adult, you need to be practicing at that high of a level as a child.
My point is not that you are wrong to be concerned about the health of young girls. My point is that changing the age limit doesn't affect what jumps girls train. So yes, you provided some studies vaguely about the effects of intense physical activity on young girls, but that still does not answer my question, which is how the age limit has anything to do with this. Because the way I see it, the only thing the age limit changes is who is competing against who. And I'm genuinely curious what makes you think otherwise.
It's Post 204 on page 11.