Ah well, I don't really follow Nathan so I don't know about that case. Second, I'm not saying her getting 0 GOE on the 3A is a crime punishable by death, I'm simply stating, I don't agree with that and if it were up to me, I would have scored it differently. It is one factor that would impact her score right? And if it were up to me that element would have scored differently and thus her entire program score would have been lower. And did I compare scores across competitions because I don't recall that? You obviously shouldn't, sorry if I did. And besides it's simply because I felt like Kamila's score was too high and thus I wanted to see what I would have done differently. Now if this were, say, Liza Nugumanova, and she for some reason got a positive GOE on a step-out but her score was still like 64, I wouldn't look into that because the score itself made sense to me (I mean it obviously doesn't because the PCS should pull her scores up much higher but that won't happen and it's a completely different argument).
The judging at Skate America was at least as ridiculous as the one on those cups. Generally, the Russians aren‘t the only ones who use scoring to push their favorites. The US does it all the time and while I used to think the scoring in Japanese competitions was fairer, turns out it actually isn‘t. Stricter scoring doesn‘t necessarily equate to fairer scoring. This is probably heavily off-topic but if you deflate everyone else‘s scores while inflating the ones of your favorites, it‘s still not fair. It just gives the impression because: “oooh, so strict, look at how they do it compared to the Russians who unfairly overscore.“ Yeah, no. So, bringing Nathan as an example isn‘t really even an argument. Just because he, too, is from a fed that uses this judging practice, doesn‘t make it fair. This is a general problem and Kamila‘s scores are not the epitome, nor anything unusual based on almost all competitions we‘ve seen in the past few season - and especially this one. Which is a bit depressing but, again, this thread‘s not really the place to whine about current scoring practices.
I‘m not claiming to be especially knowledgeable about the rules as I‘m not a skater myself but: here‘s what I copied from the rulebook on GOE:
1. very good height and distance
2. good take-off and landing
3. effortless throughout (including rhythm in a combination or sequence)
4. steps into a jump, unexpected or creative entry
5. very good body position from take-off to landing
6. element matches the music
Landing on two feet, stepping out: -3 to -4
So, analysing Kamila‘s 3A:
Imo, she wouldn‘t even get the first bullet with a perfectly landed 3A because it is a very low jump. It basically has the same height and distance as her 2A, she just rotates infinitely faster to make it work. She probably would deserve the second bullet for the 3A we saw her do in the warm-up - but in the competition she had a step-out, so no way there was a “good landing“. Effortless throughout - again, for the one in the warm-up, yes. To me, Kamila‘s 3A isn‘t very visually impressive because it‘s so small but considering she makes it look like a 2A, it‘s more than effortless. When she jumps it well, it looks like there‘s no strain involved at all. But the one in the competition had a step-out, which is a visible error, ergo not effortless. I think we can safely exclude bullet point 5 for the same reason.
Now, 4 and 6 are interesting. I do think the way they placed the 3A matches the music - I actually thought even the step-out was on a musical accent, which was funny. I‘d definitely give her that one. She does have a short transition into the 3A but it‘s not seamless into it, she pauses afterwards and prepares the jump. It‘s by no means an excessively long set-up but it‘s also not even close to the intricate steps Aliona used to do into her 3A last season. So, for that reason, I wouldn’t award Kamila‘s 3A the bullet point 4. But I can see how others think differently here.
So, if we account for the fact that her step-out, while visually distractive, wasn‘t as bad as a hand-down or a fall and she recovered quickly, I‘d say we should reduce the GOE by 3, not 4.
I‘d come to a final GOE of -2 (+1 normally and -3 for the step-out) If you give her the creative entry bullet, you‘d go to -1.
It’s higher than I expected for an error but that‘s what I found. Correct my mistakes, please. One question I had during this exercise, for example, was how you judge jumps overall. Do you take the jump at hand (i.e taking the step-out into account for every single GOE bullet or do you imagine a perfect landing, go from there and only afterwards deduct the mandatory -3/-4?) It may sound like a stupid question but I‘m honestly confused right now.
Also, interestingly enough, since the first three bullets are mandatory for a +4 or +5, Kamila‘s jumps (safe for that enormous 4T) would never get +4 or +5 in my eyes. Most have average to small height, especially her edge jumps. She makes up for it with good flow and rotational speed but if we take the rule books seriously, imo, she‘d be capped at +3.
There‘s also the thing about PCS. If anyone could explain seriously to me why Tarakanova should get 7s for her FS while Valieva deserves mid to high 9s, I would be grateful. There was a 14 points overall difference between the two, despite Valieva falling and Tarakanova skating cleanly. Just food for thought.
Kamila’s still insanely good for her age, obviously. Right now she’s the favorite for basically every competition she enters. As long as she skates cleanly, Gold is hers and it’s not hard to see why. Everyone knows my opinion about the rest, so I‘ll just leave it at that.
Congratulations to her on the Gold - and Nastya Tarakanova on a medal!! I wanted Silver (felt she was underscored in the FS..) but oh well. Not complaining. Medal‘s a medal. And a ticket to Nationals!! Now, please stafe and healthy.
So what do we have then? Oh, yes, those "magical skating skills" where Japanese ladies are supposedly much better than the Russians. When there are no quads, what is left but referring to skating skills?
Oh come on, you‘ve got to be kidding me. It‘s not hating to say the Japanese skaters have, on average, way better skating skills than the Russians. In fact, it‘s plain as day. And skating skills are the foundation this sport is built on. It‘s figure skating after all. So, yes, they don‘t matter all that much in the current system but the difference still exists. Watch how Japanese ladies gain speed, take a look at their edges, their flow. It‘s all there.
Skating is not just quads. It‘s true quads win you the most points that‘s why everyone‘s trying them. And currently, the Russian ladies are the best at them. So, of course, they‘re winning. This is a sport and currently, they‘re the better jumpers, the ones pushing the system. But they‘re not better at everything and I don‘t see how saying that diminishes the Russian ladies‘ talent.
And honestly, you keep talking about whatever was said in the Japanese ladies thread. I don‘t follow it religiously because safe for Wakaba (and Rika and Satoko but they weren‘t there), there‘s no Japanese lady I‘m currently interested in. But from what I‘ve seen, there was sharp criticism of the judging, a real analysis of Kaori‘s and Wakaba‘s jumps. There wasn‘t just praise and I haven‘t exactly seen any digs at the Russians. So, really, I have no idea what you‘re complaining about.
