But she doesn't deserve it right? Because she's just a jumping machine.
And where do you get off writing that Plushenko only gave 50% effort in Vancouver? I thought he was a hack without an artistic bone his body, those crap programs were the best he could come up with.
Or are you holding him to an impossible standard. I didn't see Patrick Chan or Evan attempting quads. Shame too since they're so damn easy.
No, she doesn't deserve it because her projection/extension/expression all need work. Things still look mechanical compared to Anna/Kamila.
When did I say Plushenko gave 50% effort in Vancouver? He obviously gave a lot of effort, however, he needed better programs and his jumps were off in his FS which compromised their GOE, and he left out a double loop. And that's when overall skating and minor details actually added up and cost him the gold. Plushenko essentially figured if he stayed on his feet, being the only one with a consisted quad/3A, he would win (he was even fist pumping before the results came up). He probably didn't think a lowly double loop or lack of transitions could cost him - who cares about them compared to the quad! He also lost the GPF to Sandhu by leaving out a 3S (again because he landed everything else and was oblivious to the Zayak, which was a bad rule but still the rules at the time everyone had to compete under).
He's a legendary figure skater, and arguably the most technically consistent ever, but other than Yagudin, he didn't have a ton of worthy contemporaries who were technically consistent enough to challenge him and push him to work on the other aspects of his skating. It's why his well-deserved OGM in 2006 were still probably his worst programs, but it was a runaway because the other guys could barely do consistent triple axels and were just fighting for silver/bronze compared to a guy with a consistent quad and triple axel. Unfortunately, for Trusova, there are skaters who can push her technically, so it's costing her wins... but fortunately for Trusova that will hopefully push her to improve other aspects of her skating.
If the state of affairs was that only Trusova could do quads,, I do not believe that Trusova (under Plushenko) would not reach her potential because he would train her to a point where all she needs to do is land the jumps because (like he was) she'd be technically so far ahead that the program/artistry/etc. didn't have as much bearing, and a win was certain if nobody else had your difficulty, which you yourself did cleanly. There are things Trusova can work on, not just her edge call but her levels. And the PCS components earlier.
Look, I'm all for technical difficulty giving a skater a competitive advantage. Trusova deserved to win against technically inferior international skaters who had nicer programs/artistry, because I thought her technical edge with the quads deserved gold over skaters who can't do quads, the same way if Plushenko did quads and the other guys in the field couldn't even go clean with just triple axels, he deserved to beat them. But Anna not only did more program content (higher BV), but she's executing it better, and with better artistry. So if both go clean, Anna gets the gold. Contrary to what you believe, if Trusova adds 2 more quads, get better execution and that manages to close the gap, I absolutely think her win would be legitimate and wouldn't just dismiss her as a jumping bean.