What is this nonsense?
Most of Trusova's jumps do not pre-rotate as much as Shcherbakova's anymore, btw, and her landings tend to be farther around as well. Trusova's 4Lutz is getting 1/4 turn more rotation in the air (her best ones anyway)
Very interesting, how Trusova's 3Lz+3Lo in the Nationals LP was better than Shcherbakova's in every way possible, yet scored the same GOE from 4 of the judges.
Well, a lot of this post seems to completely miss the mark on what I was talking about. I was talking about the extensive hate hate campaign against Shcherbakova, instead of saying that her quads are better than Trusova's or anything of the nature, so it's puzzling how that seems to have been how you misunderstood my post. Even if her quads are worse, she doesn't deserve a hate campaign launched against her.
On "what is this nonsense"-part, Koola King stopped criticizing Medvedeva and started praising her non-stop instead after she moved under Orser, while starting to criticize Shcherbakova with mostly fabricated issues, like the 45 degree Lutz inside edge video - you even recognized in your post that that's not accurate. Shcherbakova wasn't exactly on top in 2018 summer, she hadn't even entered seniors. It's not nonsense, perhaps you just don't know the history. But in that case you probably shouldn't make such comments as it makes it sound like you're not familiar with the subject matter.
That second point ranges from not very relevant to completely irrelevant to my point about the hate campaign against Shcherbakova. It's been going on since 2018, Trusova moved away from Eteri in 2020. You're talking as if it's a recent development using the current status. Trusova definitely wasn't getting her "best quads" "fully around" more than Shcherbakova at that time. But even if she was, that doesn't justify the hate campaign. Also, you're using Trusova's "best quads" but not comparing those to Shcherbakova's best ones apparently, since you're suggesting that her landings are further along, when Shcherbakova's best quads land straight backwards with no hook to speak of. I'd call that biased.
A comment unrelated to my previous post's content: Like it or not, consistency matters for scoring, and Trusova for the past few years has been anything but consistent. Also, Anna surely as a two-time national champion has some "status scoring" as well. In fact, for her first season, I found her quite underscored overall, so they clearly have changed their approach when it comes to her. But regardless, in my post I wasn't even saying that her quads are better than Trusova's, just that she doesn't deserve a hate campaign. So your entire post was simply misguided and besides the point.
Now, as for the 3Lz+3Lo combos of Anna's SP vs Trusova's FS. Anna has a lot better flow out of it. Also, on both jumps she has delayed rotation, while Trusova doesn't, and she has a much more aesthetically pleasing aerial position. It also looks more effortless. To be honest, now watching them multiple times, I don't see how one can find Trusova's 3Lz+3Lo more impressive unless they just concentrate on the takeoff edge or something. Anna's quite clearly was the better combo.
I think that this is the issue with your technical panelist background. You just concentrate on the technical panelist stuff, which GOE isn't a part of. And GOE isn't precise or absolute like technical panelist calls, GOE is largely about gut feeling, you don't have to perfectly rationalize everything about GOE. To me, it's clear that if a random judge sees those jump combos one after another, they'll feel the need to rate Anna's with higher GOE.