The consistancy factor became important in the 2019 season when they changed the rules quite drastically. BVs for quads got lower, +5/-5 was introduced meaning that if you fall you get punished A LOT. Back in the Zagitova Olympic season 2018 it wasn't like this at all. Back then, the men with their quads could put in a lot of quads that they knew they would never land but they got the points anyway - and they might beat a clean skater.I think it's incredibly unlikely anything will jeopardize their positions, they'd have to suddenly lose all their jumps!
But see that's a problem if Sasha skated the same as she did then and suddenly gets 10 or more points (allowing her to challenge a clean Kamila) then that proves the scoring system is completely bogus. Sasha's lovely skates at Nats should be worth what they were worth. How can they score higher without noticible improvement or more difficult content? To me that's like if in a running race or swimming event they suddenly decided a minute wasn't 60 seconds this time it's now 70 seconds. You can't just change things like that)
I still don't understand when consistency became an acceptable way to get higher scores? I clearly recall a time where people said consistency was pretty much a cheat and just because a skater always landed this or that jump didn't mean they were any good at said jump or had good skating skills at all.
You forget that Sasha at RusNats had her best score ever. It was fantastic. She was a bit overscored, and yes, so were the others, but she would still have been third when the others are clean. And yes, Anna had more difficult content, Kamila had not, but they both surpass Sasha in the artistic department and in spins.
It's no use in seeing Sasha as the victim here, she has chosen her path and she has to deal with that. So, another clean skate at RC Final would mean that she will probably score higher, not because of the judges, but because she is getting more confident in what she is doing.
). And that's crazy when you think about it.