2021 Worlds are still on | Page 9 | Golden Skate

2021 Worlds are still on

Status
Not open for further replies.
I understand the arguments. I made a forecast: the trend will stay positive. The worldwide number of new daily cases will revert to last summer level (250K vs. 750K in the peak vs. 500K now) by the end of March. I shall come back to it but in 3 week time.
 
I understand the arguments. I made a forecast: the trend will stay positive. The worldwide number of new daily cases will revert to last summer level (250K vs. 750K in the peak vs. 500K now) by the end of March. I shall come back to it but in 3 week time.
It will be very interesting to see what the numbers do compared to last summer in the US. As I traveled around the western US last year, I check the local case numbers and for many rural places, they were very low. Until the end of my Utah trip in Sept......this year, we have the vax and we have a very wide spread virus with varients springing up everywhere....here is the US pre Superbowl going back to August and forwards in time to June. Daily deaths are trending down. If the Superbowl has an effect on deaths, it should show up about April as the deaths lag the cases by roughly 17 day....
a covid deaths.jpg
 
It seems likely the World Championships will be held without many top skaters, from Gabriella Papadakis and Guillaume Cizeron to possibly the entire Canadian and Japanese teams. That means entries to the 2022 Olympics and 2022 Worlds shouldn’t be awarded to countries solely on the results in Stockholm (and at Nebelhorn Trophy).

I propose this one-time alternative:

Rank senior skaters by their best score achieved at any of the following events: the 2021 Worlds (if it is held), the fall 2021 Grand Prix series, and the fall 2021 Challenger Series. Keep only the top 3 scores per country in each discipline, and award entries based on that ranking.

The ISU probably would use something similar to the current quotas, awarding 3 spots to a nation if the rankings of its top 2 skaters/teams add up to 13 or less, and so on.

Another option, since these are unusual circumstances anyway, would be to award a second or third spot to countries that have a second or third skater/team ranked in the top 4 groups (24 in singles, 20 in ice dance, and 16 in pairs). This could let a few more top skaters qualify.

What might these fields look like? I’ll use the 2019-20 season best list for ladies as an example, just to have some numbers to play with. Remember, I’m only counting seniors, and only the top 3 per country.

http://www.isuresults.com/isujsstat/sb2019-20/sbtslto.htm

In this case, the traditional quotas produce 3 spots each for Russia, Japan and the United States (just barely), while South Korea gets 2. The 24th spot awarded by country would go to Australia.

The “top 4 flights” option lets Russia, Japan, the U.S. and South Korea breeze to 3 entries each, while Finland earns 2. Canadians Alicia Pineault and Emily Bausback rank 24th and 25th, respectively, so Canada would need just a slight improvement to send 2 ladies.

Please feel free to check my math, or see how this approach might work for dance, pairs, or the men. But I think either option could produce an Olympic or World Championships field close to what we’d want to see, even if the 2021 Worlds are canceled.
 
New entry requirements for Sweden go into effect today, until the end of March:


A negative COVID-19 test within 48 hours of entry is now required (though those under 18 people are exempt). There is also a request for seven days quarantine on arrival.

This is on top of Sweden's travel ban on "non-essential" travel from outside of the EU, but I'm sure they'll figure out a way to consider a figure skating competition "essential".
 
New entry requirements for Sweden go into effect today, until the end of March:


A negative COVID-19 test within 48 hours of entry is now required (though those under 18 people are exempt). There is also a request for seven days quarantine on arrival.

This is on top of Sweden's travel ban on "non-essential" travel from outside of the EU, but I'm sure they'll figure out a way to consider a figure skating competition "essential".

I take travel bans and restrictions with a grain of salt for anyone outside of us commoners; because there are too many examples of govt. authorities (who impose these restrictions) flat-out ignoring them and of exceptions being made for certain groups. Look at sports - they are still allowed to go on with much more contact likely, example American football is a contact sport by design, even regular football is more contact related than going to restaurants but restaurants have to operate at a very limited capacity and have barriers separating patrons and all kinds of restrictions.
 
Not offering this as a political comment but just something I saw in today's Wall Street Journal Friday, Feb 5th, "World News", Page A9, one third page article. "Virus Worries Loom over Beijing Games". It talks about the virus but at the end it says, and I quote, "...a spokeswoman for President Biden said Tuesday that the US had no plans to boycott the Games, nor had it discussed such a move with allies."
 
Not offering this as a political comment but just something I saw in today's Wall Street Journal Friday, Feb 5th, "World News", Page A9, one third page article. "Virus Worries Loom over Beijing Games". It talks about the virus but at the end it says, and I quote, "...a spokeswoman for President Biden said Tuesday that the US had no plans to boycott the Games, nor had it discussed such a move with allies."
the boycott of Beijing games is not about covid though.. it's about many things, mostly human rights.
 
I understand the arguments. I made a forecast: the trend will stay positive. The worldwide number of new daily cases will revert to last summer level (250K vs. 750K in the peak vs. 500K now) by the end of March. I shall come back to it but in 3 week time.
Interesting thoughts. Have you made any thought if this includes different scenarios where the different mutants will be dominant? The reason I ask is that in Norway the numbers have been quite low recently and we didn´t have the big wave after the Christmas holiday as feared, numbers did actually go down a little (we had very strict restrictions at the beginning of the year) at the same time we are finding more and more cases now of B117 cases. Now the numbers aren´t decreasing but it has stagnated.

We expect though the numbers to rise again soon because it seems the B117 is getting dominant and there are several big outbreaks going on. We even have cases now with the South African-strain where they havn´t found patient zero yet, so we might have two mutations that could be dominant. So what we experience could be demonstrated in this figure which illustrates the situation in Denmark as well.

EtYbj3xXMAAwBVS


Numbers could be having a temporary decline because the old variants are dying, while the B117 is increasing. B117 is so contagious that you need harder restrictions to keep it under control - that might explain why the old variants is having such a decline.

To give you an illustration of how difficult B117 is to keep under control: We have a big outbreak in a small village in Norway by the fjords, there is 1000 inhabitants living there. There have just been a few isolated cases before. Until last week. There was a family who came back from Italy (visiting family). They followed every rule and was quarantined for 10 days as they should, and tested negative at day 10. So they were done with the quarantine and started going to work and school. At day 11 or 12 they developed symptoms, isolated themselves and tested positive for the B117. The last days there have been detected 80 cases in the town, and there are probably a few more. 500 people are in quarantine now because of that, which means half the village is affected. And 5% of the inhabitants have already tested positive in this breakout.

It seems 10 days of quarantine is not enough for the B117. When the pandemic started we had 14 days in Norway, but they changed it to 10 days some months later because it seemed it was enough for the old variant. Old distant rule seems also to not be efficient now. Old restrictions is not enough to prevent such outbreaks.

Because of that I think we will see an increase in Europe when the B117 will be fully dominant, and numbers will start rise. I´m not sure though how the situation is outside Europe, so there might be a increase in Europe but still a decrease worldwide.

The B117-threat is also the reason now why Sweden is having more restrictions.
 
So it does work? I'm just concerned because it's got such bad press and if it doesn't work, but all the Russian skaters and coaches think it does they may take unnecessary risks. In which case they should be removed from the competition, which would be a huge blow :(
It works, better than other recombined vaccines, but as with all other products, particularly those working to elicit antibodies targeting the spike protein, they don't "work" enough to allow people to fool around, even after the second jab, it would even be the opposite (need for more prudence) given what we see; specially where new variants have been detected because these products are not efficient against them. These new variants (UK, South Africa and Brazil) with nearly all their mutations on this very spike protein (while until now, mutations would occur anywhere) seem to have been fostered in people who have had something done against spike protein (probability very near 1). My guess (plus, developing new mutations would have been faster given that the beginning of the trial was with 1 + 1 doses, with very low efficacy, before opting for ½ + 1, more efficient) :
 
Interesting thoughts. Have you made any thought if this includes different scenarios where the different mutants will be dominant? The reason I ask is that in Norway the numbers have been quite low recently and we didn´t have the big wave after the Christmas holiday as feared, numbers did actually go down a little (we had very strict restrictions at the beginning of the year) at the same time we are finding more and more cases now of B117 cases. Now the numbers aren´t decreasing but it has stagnated.

We expect though the numbers to rise again soon because it seems the B117 is getting dominant and there are several big outbreaks going on. We even have cases now with the South African-strain where they havn´t found patient zero yet, so we might have two mutations that could be dominant. So what we experience could be demonstrated in this figure which illustrates the situation in Denmark as well.

EtYbj3xXMAAwBVS


Numbers could be having a temporary decline because the old variants are dying, while the B117 is increasing. B117 is so contagious that you need harder restrictions to keep it under control - that might explain why the old variants is having such a decline.

To give you an illustration of how difficult B117 is to keep under control: We have a big outbreak in a small village in Norway by the fjords, there is 1000 inhabitants living there. There have just been a few isolated cases before. Until last week. There was a family who came back from Italy (visiting family). They followed every rule and was quarantined for 10 days as they should, and tested negative at day 10. So they were done with the quarantine and started going to work and school. At day 11 or 12 they developed symptoms, isolated themselves and tested positive for the B117. The last days there have been detected 80 cases in the town, and there are probably a few more. 500 people are in quarantine now because of that, which means half the village is affected. And 5% of the inhabitants have already tested positive in this breakout.

It seems 10 days of quarantine is not enough for the B117. When the pandemic started we had 14 days in Norway, but they changed it to 10 days some months later because it seemed it was enough for the old variant. Old distant rule seems also to not be efficient now. Old restrictions is not enough to prevent such outbreaks.

Because of that I think we will see an increase in Europe when the B117 will be fully dominant, and numbers will start rise. I´m not sure though how the situation is outside Europe, so there might be a increase in Europe but still a decrease worldwide.

The B117-threat is also the reason now why Sweden is having more restrictions.
There are several factors to consider about the new strain and they are all related in a difficult multi variable problem. 1. The growth in numbers vs. the achieved total numbers. Judging by your graph, the first one is high but the second one is still quite small. 2. The severity of the new strain. If is the same or worse, that's one story. If it is similar to flu let alone common cold - it is another one. There's a saying in Russia: if you are burned by milk you will blow at the cold water. 3. The effect of vaccines and secondary immunity on a new strain. 4. The negative consequences of the quarantine vs. humanitarian and other aspects of the lenient approach (what Sweden had and Russia has now).

We know that Spanish flu lost its power not because of quarantine or vaccines but because new mutations proved to be less lethal. Maybe we have the same now.
 
Last edited:
There are several factors to consider about the new strain and they are all related in a difficult multi variable problem. 1. The growth in numbers vs. the achieved total numbers. Judging by your graph, the first one is high but the second one is still quite small. 2. The severity of the new strain. If is the same or worse, that's one story. If it is similar to flu let alone common cold - it is another one. There's a saying in Russia: if you are burned by milk you will blow at the cold water. 3. The effect of vaccines and secondary immunity on a new strain. 4. The negative consequences of the quarantine vs. humanitarian and other aspects of the lenient approach (what Sweden had and Russia has now).

We know that Spanish flu lost its power not because of quarantine or vaccines but because new mutations proved to be less lethal. Maybe we have the same now.
Mutations can go both way, they can get milder or worse. So far there isn´t any indication that the B117 is milder, there are still people being hospitalized and need for unit care. There are even suggestions that younger people are getting sicker by this mutation. The effect of vaccines is of course something we should use in the calculation which could be a game changer. But it won´t happen that fast. If i´m lucky I will get the first dose maybe by July. That´s the plan here in Norway for my age group. I don´t think the situation will be much better by the end of March. Maybe 250 000 daily cases in July would be my guess. We know from last spring the we experienced a rapid fall in new cases, because the measures had worked. But last spring there wasn´t more contagious mutations. But let´s see again in 3 week how the situation goes :)
 
The B117-threat is also the reason now why Sweden is having more restrictions.
The B-117 variant is already yesterday's news. Now there is a B-117 variant with an E484K mutation thrown in. One pre-release study has shown that original coronavirus antibodies in some people were up to 90% less effective against this new variant.
 
The B-117 variant is already yesterday's news. Now there is a B-117 variant with an E484K mutation thrown in. One pre-release study has shown that original coronavirus antibodies in some people were up to 90% less effective against this new variant.
I heard about this, the scientists have actually named it the "EEK" mutation which doesn't bode well...

I hope it doesn't/hasn't reached Russia. 😱
 
The B-117 variant is already yesterday's news. Now there is a B-117 variant with an E484K mutation thrown in. One pre-release study has shown that original coronavirus antibodies in some people were up to 90% less effective against this new variant.
Oh no, where is the virus detected? The borders are closed now, so there will hopefully be less imported cases. But the one with residence is of course allowed inside the country.
 
Is this the EEK?

I like following Dr. Gottlieb and he doesnt talk down to me....
Our Dr. Gottlieb said today on "Face the Nation", his weekly interview platform....

The UK mutant B117 is now about one percent of the US case. About 5 % of So. Cal. Cases and about 5-10 % Florida cases. The explosion of new mutants seems to have slowed down. Vaccines in use still have good ability to counter the Denmark, UK, Brazil and SA mutants. Expect a booster shot this Fall for the new mutants. He doesn’t think the current WHO mission to Wuhan will be able to find out if this pandemic was an accident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology or a "natural" event.

In the US, Vaccine supply will outstrip demand after April at some point and the next challenge will be to “address the demand”. He did not mention the vaccine passport “carrot and stick” approach. He tends to not get into the political side but he did mention there was a political component to the WHO mission. As always, you can watch his interview on Face the Nation on demand on the web.
a scott g file.jpg
 
I hope it doesn't/hasn't reached Russia. 😱
I mean, I hope it doesn't go nutso anywhere, and I am more concerned about it not reaching here. Weird flex to say you hope it doesn't reach Russia, but okay.
 
I mean, I hope it doesn't go nutso anywhere, and I am more concerned about it not reaching here. Weird flex to say you hope it doesn't reach Russia, but okay.
Well I was just thinking it's more likely to reach Russia, since they don't have strict protocols over there, like do they even do hotel quarantine?

Whereas here in Australia we're being super careful, aren't our processes the strictest in the world?

I'm not sure what you mean by "flex", I like a lot of Russian skaters and yes they're being irresponsible, but I don't think they deserve to be ravaged by COVID because of it, no-one does.
 
Not offering this as a political comment but just something I saw in today's Wall Street Journal Friday, Feb 5th, "World News", Page A9, one third page article. "Virus Worries Loom over Beijing Games". It talks about the virus but at the end it says, and I quote, "...a spokeswoman for President Biden said Tuesday that the US had no plans to boycott the Games, nor had it discussed such a move with allies."

Very little of the calls for boycotting the Beijing games have been centered around Covid but due to human rights abuse issues, though some has been tied to the virus. I tried to Google and find the article, but I remember seeing an article last year where it talked about the only people that got hurt from the 1980 boycott was the athletes; if countries do boycott or want to make a statement about China, I hope that they find a way to do it without refusing the athletes the choice to go and compete. Athletes don't have a choice in where the Olympics get held and it would really stink that they work so hard and then don't get the option to go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top