I thought none of Aliona's four programs was really bad and while they lacked some wow factor, I think she presented them all beautifully, but she certainly had some stamina problems.
I thought the last 2 programs were better than the first 2, and considering she didn't appear to be 100% and they were the first competition I think they could have been improved. Given the coaching change I would be surprised if we see them again
I thought none of Aliona's four programs was really bad and while they lacked some wow factor, I think she presented them all beautifully, but she certainly had some stamina problems.
Many people said they were too empty, but I don't think busy programs are the one and only approach to high PCS. Carolina Kostner never had those crazy transitions and still she had the highest PCS, whether you agree with this or not. Same applies to Osmond I think.
Well I think we can all agree that PCS is very subjective and has generally been the place we see reputation scoring show up. There was a grand prix event or maybe europeans in 2018 where she skated pretty bad in the FS and still got a pretty good score and Johnny Weir made a comment after the score came up referencing Kostner being 'supported' for the Olympics...the jest of his comment was that the judges were extremely gracious with her scoring because she was a favorite. That's just 1 example I'm sure we could blow up the forum if everyone chimed in with examples of where skaters got a PCS score based on something other than what was actually put down on the ice...if someone wants to open that can of worms they should open a thread for it though. Note, that won't be me

Love his choreography or not, Daniil's transition heavy programs and the consistency that their new-seniors win/place well with them usually leads to really good PCS scoring.
Last edited:
)
She needed it.