Being 'that Russian fan of Shoma Uno' that I am, I just wanted to say 'thank you' for your interest in my article. I am glad a few people found my discussion useful.
And wow, I really enjoyed reading your own discussion of Nathan's program here -- so many beautiful and nuanced observations! In a way, now I regret that I did not do any 'comparative research'

, i.e. did not incorporate the earlier versions of Nathan's program into my discussion. On the other hand, it would not be easy to accomplish with the kind of structure that I had in mind.
Anyway, thanks again for reading my analysis! Cheers from Shomaland!