Is there a rule that states this somewhere or are we saying “should” as a matter of opinion?
I guess you still haven't watched Michael Slipchuk's interview. Yes, there are rules. Apparently, they moved up the women following KV's D/Q but didn't reallocate points. That's what many of us have been talking about. How can Wakaba for instance, now is in first for her segment, but gets only 9 points ? It should be ten. And so on. So Slipchuk is asking the ISU why they are not following their own rules. He wants to know the rationale behind it. In other words, they are looking to appeal, not based on opinions, but based on the rule book.
Mostly just curious because given Olympic history in all sports I’m surprised that there wouldn’t be a rule in place to address disqualifications on an event and have steps in place to address them. I know everyone tested clean at the Olympics but there has to be a measure in place to address if someone had failed one “in competition”. Does it also factor into how the discipline is dished out whether or not the failed test was at the Olympics or prior to the Olympics taking place? A lot of variables at hand here.
The date of a failed test doesn't matter. "Clean at the Olympics" has no impact if there is a positive test from a couple months before. The sample could have been taken in training, in the off-season or in competition. Doesn't make any difference. As a matter of fact, many athletes get caught during the off-season. The point for random testing and off-season testing is exactly to avoid people using drugs for a little while, to gain an advantage, withdraw from the drugs and go to their events, where they already expect to be tested, avoiding a positive test.
Some of these drugs do not get detected for very long... only traces are left after some time. It is still very possible to cheat and not get caught. So that's why when someone is caught, they better have a good explanation, which in this case, has been judged not convincing.
The rules are there. Again, if you dared watching Slipchuk's interviews (he's made more than one) Skate Canada, from the rule book, knew already that the whole ROC team wouldn't get D/Q. They were just waiting to see what the CAS judgment would be. As they ruled about a 4 year ban and stripping of all results -which is a common ban btw for similar cases, then the ISU should have reallocated these points.
This is why people have been talking about this so much... What is the rationale for the ISU to move up the women one spot in the team event results but not reallocate the points?
You may see this as a loss of 20 points for the ROC team, but in fact, it's not. By not reallocating the ranking points, Valieva still retains 2 points on everyone on the field.
I hope this summary helps. I can understand, with so many posts in that thread, that people are getting confused about the rules and perhaps imagine that it's just fans ranting based on nationalistic preferences. It's not about that.
For me, it's not even about Canada, It's about doping a child. I think the consequences should be much heavier in order for this to never happen again. Yes, I am naïve.. but that's my wish for the sport I love. Considering it starts from a very young age, it has to be safe, clean and healthy.