The lab kept retesting Valieva's sample and had to come up with new methods of testing the sample until they received the positive result.
I've told you at least 5 times that this is not what happened. Her sample was always positive, from the start. They had to modify the method protocol to ensure that the positive result was actually not a false positive and would hold up under scrutiny. That is what
actually happened.
At this point, it is very clear that you have a) zero idea of the work done in a lab or of the method that was used in this case and b) are unwilling to learn but very willing to stubbornly keep on repeating your false perception of reality.
Breaking the Olympic truce means being at war during the Olympics right? I can name you one country that was fighting illegal wars during all the Olympics from 2002-2021.
No, an Olympic truce is not about "being at war", it's about not declaring new wars and ceasefires in existing wars. The US probably skirted the lines, I don't deny that, but I can't find an example of them actually outright breaking the Olympic truce.
And all wars are illegal, by the way, there are no legal ones.
Just for your information, civil wars/conflicts like the Mexican Drug War also do not fall under the Olympic truce.
I can also name you another country right now who fighting an illegal war. Their leader has an arrest warrant over his head for genocide, and crimes against humanity. Those athletes are not banned.
But now that they have been, violation of Oly truth should lead to suspension, particularly when condemned by all the top international watchdogs. It makes so much sense to use Olympics as a moral compass. Compass, however, should always point in the true direction not be like a weather wane.
What about it taking 3 (!) violations of the Olympic truce for Russia to be banned is so hard to understand? Is there another country that violated the Olympic truce three times, especially not due to ongoing conflicts but because they actually started
new wars/armed conflicts during the period of the Olympic truce?
Do I think more countries should be banned? Yes, sure. But if it took three violations to ban one country, it's actually more hypocritical to ban others after one violation already.