He says "gold-medal free dance'. Read it again...I believe he felt they should have won the free dance.
When one refers to "gold medal" anything, athletes refer to an event or an effort that seals a win. Hence, I think one could conclude Moir felt that their free dance should have help seal the win. I see it as that Moir felt their free dance was superior enough to win the entire competition.
Five points is a lot to overtake, but not impossible. After all D/W only needed a .53 lead in the FD to win Worlds and they won by 4 points in the FD. Certainly, I can see that Moir felt their dance was good enough to make up for the gap.
As far as I know they don't offer small medals in the GPF, so there's really no such thing as a "gold-medal free dance."
ETA: Also, this makes sense considering that in past competitions, V/M sealed their wins in PCS. In the Olympics for example, V/M only beat D/W by .3 of a point in TES. But their Olympic win was secured with a two point lead in PCS. Even when D/W won the FD in the 2010 worlds, V/M still beat them in PCS. And D/W's 2011 Worlds win was mostly in TES. The PCS win was by more than a point, but it would make sense that Scott thought that was a one-time thing due to their programs being so relatively new.
Even further back, V/M won the 2008 Worlds FD with a PCS that was nearly six points higher.
So it clearly irks Scott that not only did they lose gold, they could not depend on PCS to close or overtake the gap.
Last edited: