In your opinion, of course. IMO, Ashley is not "technically inferior." Her skating is head and shoulders above 14-year-old Julia's. Ashley is a well-rounded, mature skater with good jumps, great choreography and wonderful interpretation, as well as top-notch polish and presentation skills. Julia is a precocious youngster who can land jumps, pull her limbs into all kinds of grotesque positions and otherwise fling herself around the ice without interpreting the music at all. With ugly costume and all, Julia at this point, at least to me, seems more suited to performing in a big top circus act. In her sp performance, Julia had obvious problems with the landing of her jumps (even though she landed them, they did not flow out, but seemed more jerky, IMO, likely partly due to her ankle injury). I don't think Julia deserved high GOEs in comparison to Ashley.
ITA, absolutely. And I'd feel the same even if I wasn't a fan of Ashley's. The sport is so short-sighted in over-rewarding precocious youngsters, IMHO.
I agree with some of your points, but not all. I don't think Julia has better spins than Ashley at all. I don't think the judges were sending any kind of message, just over-rewarding Julia. It was not Julia's best performance, simply because she did all the elements. Lack of musicality and interpretation and presentation skills should not be so highly rewarded. I'm really wondering why Universal Sports did not post a video of Ashley's performance as the second place finisher and highest placing U.S. lady in the sp! Ashley's performance has a great deal more depth and maturity than 14-year-old Julia's. I was so bored watching Julia fling her way around the ice. I'd much rather re-watch Ashley's performance.