To my amateurish view the main difference lies in speed. Yulia finishes with a good tempo - Yuna almost stops. The difficulty is also quite different. Compared their recent Sps.
Do you mean
deceleration by "finish" and "stops"? Of course skaters have to stop spinning at some point. I am not certain of what you are referring to.
Rotation 1: Yulia: 16 revolutions - 4 elements with the amazing Billman, Yuna: also 16 revolutions - 4 elements but no Billman and very slow at the end. Rotation 2 Yulia: 25 revolutions - 5 elements, Yuna 22 revolutions - 3 elements - this time her elements were very basic and yes no speed. Rotation 3: Yulia: 35 revolutions - 5 elements with the mind-boggling final i-spin, Yuna: 27 revolutions - 6 elements. Her flying-sit spin was nice and, I guess, quite difficult. But the i-spin was lamentable.
I think you have levels (i.e. difficulty) in mind when I was talking about quality of spins. (of all 3 types) The number of revolutions are primarily counted for level features. In other words, more than x revolutions in position y -> extra +1 level, etc. Most skaters count revolutions during their spins: One, two, three,... and so on. If a level feature requires 5 revolutions while maintaining a certain position, the skater will try to spin 6~7 times to be on the safe side unless she is out of sync and chasing the music. But for the most part, the number of revolution and quality of the spins are different matters. "For the most part," because doing way more revolutions than is required is indeed one bullet point under GOE guidelines, iirc. Kudos to Yulia for doing that but there are more to the quality of spins than the number of revolutions.
As for biellmann, Yuna reportedly gave up on it due to injury/pain thus she loses a level feature and she knows it. That does not make her spins bad - it's something she cannot/does not do due to its difficulty. Adelina has her signature spin that no one else does. Yuna also does a belly-up camel that I haven't seen anyone else doing. They all contribute to gaining levels.
In short, the number of revolution is a small part when judging "quality" of the spins. It rather goes to "difficulty" part, i.e. levels. A skater can do unstable spins many revolutions over, and she may get the level but she won't get quality points. Plus, in Yulia's case that only applies to her upright spins, not camel and sit spins.
If you recall my earlier post (
#3878),
usethis2 said:
if you look at them from the COP point of view, upright spin is only one third of the equation. The other two thirds are camel spins and sit spins (both with flying variants), and she is not very special on those. If I go by with her Olympic performance, I say those two other types of spins were rather poorly performed by her. Specifically: postures, shaky axis (balance), and traveling.
Edit: Found Yulia's FS in the Olympics. To me her camel spins and sit spins are average at best, and I don't see the exceedingly high number of revolutions in them, either. Only in upright positions she can pull off those extra revolutions, it seems.
Yuna:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OZM-AfZkas (1:30 Camel, 2:00 Layback, 3:00 Combination including sit spins)
Yulia:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBQhSTEvGZ0 (0:55 Camel, 3:15 Layback, 3:50 Combination including sit spins)
Again, Yulia's I-spin is phenomenal. I can understand that it's one thing that casual viewers remember after watching her performance. And there is absolutely nothing wrong about it. But if you were to judge all of her spins by the book, her overall spin performance is merely average, IMO.
Your thoughts?
P.S. 3 types of spins ->
Upright, Camel, Sit