QUOTE]I strongly disagree that Hanyu deserves this as much as Chan. How so? Because he's a former junior world champion that people predicted big things for? There's a huge gap in their records over what they accomplished this quad. Yes, Hanyu performed year after year, day after day--but he didn't even make it to Worlds in 2011. He's a one-time world bronze medalist. He was terrible at 2013 Worlds. How did he deserve this as much as Chan? You can argue over 1, maybe 2 of Chan's World wins (people seem to conveniently forget that even if Daisuke had won the free in 2012 Worlds, he had fallen in the SP and killed his chances there), but he'd still be a 3-time world medalist.
It'd be a different argument if Hanyu actually had decent programs over this quad, but his last two free programs have been complete and utter crap and Hanyu unfortunately performed them in a completely forgettable way. It's not that Hanyu can't interpret the music or project to the audience, as seen in his SP, but he really turns it off in the FS when he turns all his focus to his jumps. His stamina was previously an issue, the way they seemed to have resolved it is to have him just not worry about the performance aspect in the FS.
Hanyu had two great programs, his Parisienne Walkways SP and original Romeo & Juliet FS. Overall, I'd take Patrick Chan's programs from this quad.
So in terms of record over the past four years, in terms of ability, and in terms of what they did at the Olympics, I'd say Patrick Chan is far more deserving than Yuzuru Hanyu. Hanyu gave one of the worst Olympic gold medal-winning performances I've seen in the men's. I didn't think the bar was going to get lower than Evan Lysacek in 2010, but it just did. The falls were bad, but even worse, the program was pure junk. Patrick had errors, but the program was great and I think the performance was better. [/QUOTE]
I totally agree with.
