Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it means more guys trying quads, yes. I do not want to go back to 2010 when guys will avoid the quad in the SP and stick to just one quad in their LP just to play it safe. It's a bit selfish to want higher technical difficulty, but as you said it's important for the sport to move forwards.
I don't mind the rewards for landing the quads. I mind the little penalty they get for falling on them. The points of a triple lutz? Really. No. I don't think 4 points is enough penalty for a fall on a jump either.
Can someone explain to me the 3Lz-1/2L seq that Hanyu got on his protocol? He put his foot down after the 1/2L so the 3S would have been called in sequence?
I believe when you do a 1/2 loop, the combo ends up being called as a sequence. i.e. you can only do a 1/2 loop as part of a sequence combination.
Oh god, Jeremy. *face palm*
No way. He had fantastic programs and great competitions, winning GPF and his silver with Garden of Souls/Blues for Klook at Worlds 2012. I wouldn't have wanted to miss this, never. I'm so glad he carried on after 2010 and the lacklustre 2011 when he was thinking of retiring. His knee was never the same after his surgery and it started to hurt this season again. That's why he wasn't competitive on the jumps anymore.
Rotating the jump is the hardest part of it, technically, though. A minimal lapse of concentration, a tiny rut in the ice, moving your shoulder 1mm backwards - all of those can make a difference between a clean landing and a fall and no skater is ever 100% consistent.
You can't put your foot down during a jump sequence. Once you put your foot down, nothing past that point gets called.
I don't mind the rewards for landing the quads. I mind the little penalty they get for falling on them. The points of a triple lutz? Really. No. I don't think 4 points is enough penalty for a fall on a jump either.
This isn't about being mean this is about a competition.
Has Jeremy's quotes from today been posted here already? Been bouncing around different boards so it's kind of hard to keep track. Well in case it hasn't been posted, here's some lovely snippets
More quotes here
Ugh, why does Jeremy Abbott make it so hard to like Jeremy Abbott? I was rooting for him after his free skate and then I hear him open his mouth and it's like :disapp:
The interesting thing is that I thought Orser had some awesome "nerve-steeling" advice/approach to help his athletes be mentally calm for the Olympics. But I guess that was all Queen Yuna.
Rotating and landing on your blade is what makes it skating.
The interesting thing is that I thought Orser had some awesome "nerve-steeling" advice/approach to help his athletes be mentally calm for the Olympics. But I guess that was all Queen Yuna.
No he doesnt. For that to have happened he would have had to skate really well and still lose to Hanyu skating just as he did. Which is what poor Ten was subjected to by the awful judges at the farcial 2013 Worlds. Nothing close to that here.
Lost the FS by less than a point. Lost the overall by about 4.5
+1 :thumbsup: I think the reward for a quad is appropriate. It is obvious that, despite a LOT of men trying them in their programs, VERY FEW men have them even now, where 'have them' means able to land them even 50% of the time. THey continue to try them, despite abysmal success rates in MOST (not many, MOST) cases because the penalty is such that if you manage to fully rotate it, even if you land on your butt 80%+ of the time and you know that, it is still like having done a triple lutz, and on the off chance that THIS IS THE ONE TIME THIS SEASON you will land it, well, the reward is awesome.
I think that even if the penalty were increased, men would keep training the quad because the reward would ensure that you still can't win any medal without one as long as a few people are around who CAN land them, but fewer men would throw them indiscriminately into competition knowing full well they can't stand up on them to save their life.
I agree. He's going for the quadruple butt-jump because it gets him 6.50 anyways and he knows it. Why actually go with a programme you can excel doing?
I also don't particularly agree (although, again, I'm not a regular fan ) with the idea that there is a "forward" direction of a sport and that it implies a higher degree of difficulty per se. In other words , did this final go "forward" or "backward" compared to 2010?
If reward and penalty aren't symmetrical than you are increasing the factor of random chance versus skill.
(After waking up sore the morning after his fall in the short program), "Determined to complete the final Olympics of his career, the 28-year-old Abbott mentally ran through his planned free skate Friday morning and swapped out loops for alternate jumps. Then he wrote down his three goals for the performance on his iPad, as he always does, and showed them to his coach, Yuka Sato.
"She took the device from him, erased all that he had written and typed just one wore: 'Skate.'"