I think geogia meant Nathan?
Anyway I have nothing against Jason Brown personally, but I do think he has been over valued by default of his standing with the US federation than his ability. Likability, popularity shouldn't affect the marks too much, but seems particularly applies to him in this case, more than any skaters internationally. When that happens, this ceased to be a competitive sport but some sort of popularity contest. Take his PCS and based on those programs, is he really Jeremy Abbott good? Adam Rippon good? Josh? Hanyu? Patrick? Talent, skating skill, musicality, interpretation, would you really put above any of them? Why does the mark say otherwise, especially at home?
While I won't deny he has some good quality to his skating but he is just a good junior who has been coasting on his River Dance success. He is far from complete in his artistic endeavours (as well as tech) to warrant that level of PCS scoring he has been gifted at US Nationals right at start. While everyone else trodding away for years risking their quads never got the break they needed to progress internationally. How can anyone not look at these marks for a Junior skater/program and take these scores seriously? He made Maxim look undermarked! That is just crazy and embarrassing..
One could also consider now Jason got the PCS pull internationally was due to the absence of Abbott as the perceived US Leading man, who have always been better received and respected internationally.
There are many ways to be successful in the sport aside from upping jump difficulty. And it's been well documented that Jason, too, has been working on the quad. His team just chose not to risk putting it into competition until recently. Why should anyone hold it against him or his team for choosing a different path to success? In any sport -- and life in general -- there is more than one way to be successful.
And also regarding the whole Riverdance thing -- that was a product of hard work too. I remember bumping into Jordan Moeller at 2014 Nationals prior to the Gala and complementing him on his recent silver at the Junior level. I then made some chit-chat regarding Jason (the FS was earlier that day) and Jordan's first comment was -- "I am really happy for him. He really worked hard for this."
In the TSL interview -- Kori Ade noted some unideal conditions that Jordan and Jason worked under leading up to 2014 Nationals including mushy ice, cold rink, etc. Kori also notes that Jason is a hard worker and he has been relentless about getting the quad. So I think it's a bit much to accuse Jason of coasting on previous success.
As to whether he is Jeremy Abbott in PCS? That's the eye to the beholder, i.e judges. Having seen both of them compete against each other -- I'd say that Jeremy has better skating skills (ice coverage, speed) but Jason strength is on the performance/transitions side.
Regarding Nathan: He reminds me a lot of Patrick Chan. He is not an extroverted performer like Jason is. As I've said, he does have good skating skills and transitions. And of course the jumps at this point. When he was younger, I believe he performed more (his Novice and first junior champs program are good examples). I think in the last few years with his injuries, he's been focus on getting through his programs. At Boston, I remember being quite impressed with his technical ability and his skating, but there was more to be desired regarding performing the programs, i.e. projection to the audience.
I think it's clear we all have our favorites and that our favorites have strengths and weaknesses and they all work hard. I think to be successful in such a deep field like this U.S. men's field, nobody can afford to coast on any previous season's success.
Last edited:
. 
