In my opinion, and
only mine :
Before 2016, I did saw Tessa & Scott as artists. I'm not talking about the technique because I believe they are "artist" in this field. I'm talking about programs, taste, dance, body movement, expression and digging deep into emotions that you may not understand in the first, understanding of a concept sometimes out of the box, and so on. I just believed that with Marina, they never got to push themselves as far as I wanted them to. Carmen never went where I wanted them to go.
So when I heard that they were coming back, I was just thrilled in an artistic point of view, I almost thought we would got to see them do something like the French FD last year.
They did exceed my expectations for the SDs. I never got the greatest artistic feeling when talking about SD because it's too busy and packed. But they offered us the greatest entertainment last year, that Prince SD goes in the books.
But I was so disappointed with the FD choice (Latch). I thought "okay they will offer us somethig different I'm waiting". I just believe that the music (the Latch part) was not good enough. I didn't necessarily wanted to see romantic Tessa&Scott again, or at least in a different way. At least I was happy with the skating.
And I might get the same feeling about Moulin Rouge, because it's overused (Marie-France did not agree with this choice at first) and every girl in my rinked used it at the time. I do think that they believe in it so much that it will do them good, and it's by far the best MR I've seen, I want to see more of that. I'm waiting for this weekend in NHK.
What I mean is that I don't see them at the artists everyone claim they are (including me who thought that before), but I see them as entertainers. It's big, sharp, programs are explosive, it's an absolut joy for the spectator.
But in total honesty, it's almost like there is a lack of research. I wanted it to go so much deeper (and YES I think they can). But I'm still waiting for them to suprise me.
I can't believe I'm quoting Johnny Weir, but in 2016 GPF he said : the difference between P/C and V/M is that P/C's art could come across as "snob", you have to understand it, it's not necessarily easy, while V/M are the people's skaters. Hence my distinction.
For me (once again,
MY opinon) : I see the French more as artist because they're exploiting their style 100%, which is all about creating emotions, moments, whatever the background music may be. The music is only here to highlight or to add to the movements and the emotions. They push their own boundaries in terms of dance, and just like Marie-France, they are all about the details and that's why they do so well with her choreography. The downside is that they have to skate almost 100% clean everytime, because with their FD last year, you could see how mistake affected the general impression of it, because it was very outside the box.
That's why I don't necessarily want to see them do egyptian, Irish, or Anna Karenina.
There is absolutely
NO inferiority or superiority about one or the other, just the perception of it. And that's where the subjective part comes in.
(And it's not about being French for sure, but it's fair to say that the cultural education we receive very early helps a lot. There is even a mandatory test/Research project when you're ~14/15 yo, about Art History. Just like there is ballet dance culture in Russia. We are being taught the huge impact of Art and the subtility of it, "so that you see what another one won't".
It's Cannes versus Hollywood. But I digress, sorry

)