Once again, look at Young You's 7th placement at 4CC. Imagine if there are top US skaters, Russians and Europeans (Leona) compete at 4CC, Young You could place as low as 15th place at 4CC. You can see how risky 3A is.
If Alysa has similar performance like Young You (fell on 3A in both SP and LP), she may not even in top 15 at Olympics. Out of top 15 finish at Olympics will be BAD for Alysa's reputation and open doors for haters like you. You will have an excuse to trash her on social media everywhere. Alysa may suffer similar fate like Amber, she may not be selected for World's team in future.
If Alysa cut back the risk and only jump ONE triple axel in long program, she will be safe as top 10 finish at Olympics.
Russians are almost guaranteed going to sweep the podium. Alysa doesn't has any chance to be on podium at this point. What Alysa should do is....trying to place ahead of other American skaters, beat some Japanese/Korean and fight for top 5 finish. Alysa's Lombardia layout is good enough to achieve this goal.
Risk with triple axel is way too high and it's just not worth it. Sasha, Liza, Young You and Alysa Liu all fell on 3A in the last 2 months.It's just NOT wise to include 3A in short program. It's OK for the long program.
Simple math question. Which one is better? 100% success rate on 2A vs 10% success rate on 3A in SP?
It should be an easy answer for this math.