The "it could have been considered choreography" argument is especially ridiculous because Hanyu DIDN'T try to pass it off as choreo and DIDN'T add the jump later. If he had, we could be arguing about the fact that one of his later jumps was invalidated. As it is, there's just nothing to argue about. Unless they think Hanyu should get credit for a jump he didn't do (a theoretical second 4S) there's nothing to talk about.Where is this coming from? I have now seen this multiple times all over the internet, Hanyu fans trying to claim it could be considered choreography. Is this another one of those ridiculously bad tiktok takes? Some trend on Twitter?
Hanyu clearly set up for a Salchow, moved onto the takeoff edge for a Salchow, took off for a Salchow, and clearly rotated for a single Salchow. No judge worth their salt could possibly mistake that for choreography, and no technical panel worth their salt would call it as anything other than a 1S*.
You have three jumping passes in the short program - no more, no less. Because the 1S* took up a jumping box, he could not substitute it in without invalidating another required jump. Two invalid jumping passes would have sunk him much lower than 95.
Hanyu himself didn't try the jump again BECAUSE HE KNEW IT WOULDN'T COUNT.